2019
DOI: 10.1109/tpds.2019.2905560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Scheduling of Weighted Coflows in Data Centers

Abstract: Traditional network resource management mechanisms are mainly flow or packet based. Recently, coflow has been proposed as a new abstraction to capture the communication patterns in a rich set of data parallel applications in data centers. Coflows effectively model the application-level semantics of network resource usage, so high-level optimization goals, such as reducing the transfer latency of applications, can be better achieved by taking coflows as the basic elements in network resource allocation or sched… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unless otherwise specified, we choose the number of ports P = 20, the average job arrival rate λ = 20 and the average number of coflows n = 8. In the experiment, we compare our algorithm with DeepWeave, both based on DRL and Varys [6] and IAOA [33] that were also used as popular non-ML baselines for comparison with DeepWeave [1]. In addition, we add an ablation experiment to compare the performance of the retrained model under the same settings, removing the self-attention layer.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unless otherwise specified, we choose the number of ports P = 20, the average job arrival rate λ = 20 and the average number of coflows n = 8. In the experiment, we compare our algorithm with DeepWeave, both based on DRL and Varys [6] and IAOA [33] that were also used as popular non-ML baselines for comparison with DeepWeave [1]. In addition, we add an ablation experiment to compare the performance of the retrained model under the same settings, removing the self-attention layer.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. IAOA (Information-Agnostic Online Algorithm) [33] formulates the weighted coflow completion time minimiza-tion problem and proposes a heuristic solution with an approximation factor of 2 to the optimal solution. However, IAOA did not consider the dependency between coflows in job DAGs 3.…”
Section: Simulation Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network topology can be represented by an undirected connected graph [24][25][26] G = (V , E, W ). Where V , E, W respectively represents the set of nodes, the set of links, and the set of costs of links in the network, E is the complement of E. For link (u, v) ∈ E in the network, w (u, v) represents the cost of the link.…”
Section: Network Model and Problem Description 21 Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an another angle, the flaws of coflow have also been discussed recently. In [28], the problem of scheduling weighted coflows is addressed, where weights are used to express the importances of different coflows. Tian et al argue that there are dependencies among coflows in the context of multistage jobs and propose an approximation algorithm [29].…”
Section: B Finding New Situationsmentioning
confidence: 99%