“…However, the bulk tissue motion due to, e.g., heartbeat and breathing is inevitable for in vivo imaging, which causes the central frequency of the tissue components slightly drifting away from the zero frequency. Under this situation, the adaptive nature of ED filtering fits perfectly well to separate the moving signals from the tissue signals ( Figure 1D), leading to a better mapping of vascular networks, as experimentally demonstrated by ED-OMAG on the basis of pixel by pixel or voxel by voxel computation in (11). While statistically sound, voxel based analysis has serious drawbacks to implement ED-OMAG for real time imaging because (I) it requires expensive computational power (typically >1 h to generate a 3D optical angiogram for a typical OCT dataset of 1,024×240×240 voxels); and (II) it may fail to work when the probing voxel/pixel is totally located within moving blood, due to the fact that under this circumstance, the moving speckle, rather than tissue signal dominates the measured OCT signals, which does not satisfy ED filtering requirement to remove static tissue components (13).…”