1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf01389818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eigenspaces of invariant differential operators on an affine symmetric space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…REMARKS, (i) If r arises from a signature on Δ^ (cf. [23], see also Remark (ii) following Lemma 3.4), then Lemma 3.9 is a consequence of [23,Prop. 3.8].…”
Section: Erik P Van Den Banmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…REMARKS, (i) If r arises from a signature on Δ^ (cf. [23], see also Remark (ii) following Lemma 3.4), then Lemma 3.9 is a consequence of [23,Prop. 3.8].…”
Section: Erik P Van Den Banmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…By a similar argument as in [7] we can prove [6] for the precise assumption) there exists a w in W (j) such that P wν is an onto isomorphism. Moreover we have…”
Section: Integral Representations Of Eigenfunctionsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The restricted root system is shown by the notation in [OS1,Appendix] such as BC m1,m2,m3 n and the Lie algebra m Ξ and its complexification for any Ξ ⊂ Ψ(a p ) can be easily read from the Satake diagram as was explained in [OS2,Appendix B]. Namely, if G is semisimple, the subdiagram corresponding to Ψ(Θ) = {α ∈ Ψ(α) ; α| ap ∈ Θ ∪ {0}} is the Satake diagram of m Ξ .…”
Section: We Similarly Define a Character Of Pθ Jθ(λ) And Mθ(λ)mentioning
confidence: 99%