1967
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1103702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eine Maul- und Klauenseuche-Infektion beim Menschen

Abstract: Rinder, Schafe, Schweine und Ziegen. Die Pathogenität des Maul-und Klauenseuche-Virus für den Menschen ist in der Regel gering. Unter besonderen Bedingungen, aber recht selten, kann die Krankheit auf den Menschen übertragen werden, worüber vereinzelt in der Literatur berichtet wurde (1, 3, 6, 7, 9).Von den drei in Deutschland vorkommenden Typen des Maul-und Klauenseuche-Virus O, A und C soll der Typ C eine besondere Affinität zum Menschen aufweisen (2). Andere Autoren (7) stellten hingegen fest, daß bei den vo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not surprising as FMD in man is rare. In reported cases of FMD in man (Vetterlein, 1954;Heinig & Neumerkel, 1964;Pilz & Garbe, 1965;Armstrong, Davie & Hedger, 1967;Eissner, Bohm & Julich, 1967;Suhr Rasmussen, 1968) the source of infection was attributed to drinking infected milk, accidental self-inoculation or to handling infected animals while the skin was damaged by cuts, manicure or by dermatitis. It is likely that in some instances the patients would have inhaled virus in reasonable amounts and infection could also be ascribed to this route.…”
Section: Fmd and Man Removal Of Virus From Nosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not surprising as FMD in man is rare. In reported cases of FMD in man (Vetterlein, 1954;Heinig & Neumerkel, 1964;Pilz & Garbe, 1965;Armstrong, Davie & Hedger, 1967;Eissner, Bohm & Julich, 1967;Suhr Rasmussen, 1968) the source of infection was attributed to drinking infected milk, accidental self-inoculation or to handling infected animals while the skin was damaged by cuts, manicure or by dermatitis. It is likely that in some instances the patients would have inhaled virus in reasonable amounts and infection could also be ascribed to this route.…”
Section: Fmd and Man Removal Of Virus From Nosementioning
confidence: 99%