El &lt;i&gt;peer review&lt;/i&gt; de las revistas científicas en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales: políticas y prácticas editoriales declaradas

Cardoso, Maria Manuela Tavares de Matos

doi:10.3989/redc.2011.2.796

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…They have been driven, for instance, by the institutional and assessment policies in place in many countries that reward publication in journals listed in databases of prestige (Ainsworth and Russel, 2018). Another game-changer has been editors' efforts to improve the quality of national scientific journals and the concomitant inclusion of many such publications in international databases (Tavares de Matos Cardoso, 2011;De Filippo, 2013).…”

Section: Information Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis of Three Social Science Disciplines

Filippo

Casado

2018

Front. Res. Metr. Anal.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article analyses scientific publications of international prestige in three social science disciplines (communication, economics, and sociology) to identify possible production patterns. Emphasis is placed on the study of impact and visibility, both through bibliometric and altmetric indicators to determine similarities and differences and to establish possible inter-variable relationships. The use of measures such as the presence in social media for the study of the visibility of documents is discussed. A total of 112,300 papers published from 2013 to 2015 in the three disciplines analyzed was retrieved from the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI). Economics accounted for the largest number and was observed to have a "stable" and consolidated output profile. Collaboration, impact, and visibility were found to be inter-related in the three fields. The proportion of papers with mentions in the social media was high (around 50%) in communication and sociology, suggesting a relationship between the object of study and the medium for disseminating the findings. Tweets were the most common type of mentions. While the correlation between academic impact (citation/doc) and mentions in blog posts and tweets was observed to be low, the percentage of papers cited (78 to 96%) and the mean number of citations per paper were greater among those with than those without mentions in the social media (especially those mentioned in Google+, MSM, videos, and Wikipedia). The proportion of open access (OA) papers with mentions in the social media was higher than the percentage of open access papers as a whole in two of the three disciplines.

show abstract

Section: Information Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis of Three Social Science Disciplines

Filippo

Casado

2018

Front. Res. Metr. Anal.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Más recientemente, Fernández Quijada y otros, analizan la calidad de las revistas españolas de Comunicación, a partir del volumen de articulos, el cálculo y procedencia de autores y citaciones internacionales (Fernández-Quijada y otros, 2013;Fernández Quijada, 2010). Tambien se constatam los posibles efectos negativos de las auto-citas en el factor de impacto (Campanario y Candelario, 2010), o la transparencia de parametros informativos declarados por las propias revistas (Tavares, 2011). Para incrementar el impacto de las publicaciones en acceso abierto, TorresSalinas y otros (2009), sugieren un conjunto de estrategias para mejorar el impacto y visibilidad de las publicaciones a traves de herramientas en Red 2.0.…”

Section: Estado De La Cuestiónunclassified

Visibilidad e impacto de las revistas peruanas de Ciencias Sociales en acceso abierto

Morante¹

2016

Biblios

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenEn el presente artículo se analiza la producción científica y los principales indicadores de visibilidad internacional de 24 revistas peruanas de Ciencias Sociales indexadas en el Catálogo Latindex entre los años 2005-2014, disponibles en acceso abierto. Los resultados indican un mayor número de revistas del campo de la Psicología, Ade-Economía y Derecho, respecto del resto de áreas de conocimiento. Se observa un volumen importante de artículos publicados , así como un predominio de artículos escritos por autores nacionales sobre los extranjeros. Se constata un claro dominio de las universidades privadas, respecto de las públicas en la tarea editorial de revistas científicas. Se proponen acciones e iniciativas de incentivo para mejorar el impacto, calidad, número de citas y la presencia en motores de búsqueda internacional. Palabras clave

show abstract

What We Still Don't Know About Peer Review

Sabaj¹,

Pina-Stranger²

2016

Journal of Scholarly Publishing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International audienceDespite criticisms, the peer review process (PRP) is undoubtedly well established as an official and legitimated mechanism for evaluating and controlling scientific production. Although PRP has been a prominent object of study, we argue in this article that empirical research on PRP has not been addressed in a comprehensive way. Nine categories were applied to 150 empirical research articles on the topic with results revealing various gaps in empirical PRP research: (1) the research has been dedicated to the evaluation of the system rather than to the actual description of PRP as a concrete socio-discursive practice; (2) the most productive group of studies considers the multiple relationships between the sociological attributes (socio-demographic or scientometrical) of the actors (authors, reviewers, and editors) and the results of the process but does not take into account the texts exchanged by those actors; and (3) the few studies that do analyze the texts interchanged in the process do not take into account any of thevariables included (such as scientometrical data, agreement, and rejection rates) in the more productive areas of the field. This lack of integration among the methodological approaches to PRP results in a partial comprehension of this important process, which determines the production and dissemination of an important part of scientific knowledge

show abstract

El <i>peer review</i> de las revistas científicas en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales: políticas y prácticas editoriales declaradas

Cited by 8 publications

References 14 publications

Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis of Three Social Science Disciplines

Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis of Three Social Science Disciplines

Visibilidad e impacto de las revistas peruanas de Ciencias Sociales en acceso abierto

What We Still Don't Know About Peer Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About