2020
DOI: 10.24310/mgnmar.v1i1.7208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

El reconocimiento de la actividad investigadora universitaria como mecanismo de regulación del mercado académico

Abstract: * Este artículo deriva de una conferencia titulada El reconocimiento de la actividad investigadora universitaria ¿estímulo o freno? impartida por el autor en el 5º

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Los procesos de evaluación propician formas de organización del trabajo académico caracterizadas por la mejora de la calidad en la investigación y docencia de las disciplinas académicas. La evaluación constituye un instrumento de subjetivación que configura particulares formas de habitar la universidad (San Fabián, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Los procesos de evaluación propician formas de organización del trabajo académico caracterizadas por la mejora de la calidad en la investigación y docencia de las disciplinas académicas. La evaluación constituye un instrumento de subjetivación que configura particulares formas de habitar la universidad (San Fabián, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Research in the field of social sciences, especially in education, has characteristics that make it different from research in other sciences (Rivas, 2020). Educational processes are complex and involve a multitude of interrelated factors, the isolation of which can lead to the distortion of the knowledge sought (San Fabián, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…current evaluation system in which scientific output has become a prerequisite for access, advancement, tenure and salary or professional benefits (Ma and Ladisch, 2019;San Fabi an, 2020;Laiho et al, 2020). Moreover, faculty do not perceive that the criteria improve the quality or the rigor of their research, only the volume of their output.…”
Section: Jarhementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the lack of evidence supporting the notion that these evaluation processes produce improvements (Pattaro et al, 2022;Macheridis and Poulson, 2021) leads us to consider them as a simple method of control, reward or punishment (Huisman, 2018;Gunn, 2018) that directly affects the staff involved (university faculty) and, therefore, their institutions (Dugas et al, 2020;Jim enez, 2019;Ursin et al, 2020;Huang et al, 2016). These teachers are required to undergo continuous evaluation processes that determine their academic trajectory (Ma and Ladisch, 2019;San Fabi an, 2020;Laiho et al, 2020;Harvey, 2020). All this has consequences on work performance (prioritization of research over teaching, development of unethical practices, promotion of scientific production), on social and family relations (sacrifices of family and free time, problems with parenthood, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%