2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.62.8323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric-current-induced step bunching on Si(111)

Abstract: We experimentally investigated step bunching induced by direct current on vicinal Si(111)''1ϫ1'' surfaces using scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. The scaling relation between the average step spacing l b and the number of steps N in a bunch, l b ϳN Ϫ␣ , was determined for four step-bunching temperature regimes above the 7ϫ7-''1ϫ1'' transition temperature. The step-bunching rate and scaling exponent differ between neighboring step-bunching regimes. The exponent ␣ is 0.7 for the two regim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, d s = 1.7 − 4.5 nm gives q ef = (0.35 − 0.13)|e| as reported in earlier studies. 10,12,23 This indicates that there is a possibility for highly vicinal surfaces, with small l, to enter into a crossover between attachment-limited and diffusion-limited regimes where the characteristic length d s is comparable to l. It should be mentioned here that it is the d s value as compared to l that determines the regime of sublimation 26 and that Eq. (1) and Eq.…”
Section: B Experimental Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, d s = 1.7 − 4.5 nm gives q ef = (0.35 − 0.13)|e| as reported in earlier studies. 10,12,23 This indicates that there is a possibility for highly vicinal surfaces, with small l, to enter into a crossover between attachment-limited and diffusion-limited regimes where the characteristic length d s is comparable to l. It should be mentioned here that it is the d s value as compared to l that determines the regime of sublimation 26 and that Eq. (1) and Eq.…”
Section: B Experimental Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were later annealed for time intervals ranging between 15 and 60 minutes at 1270 • C (regime III) with current driven along the miscut in the down-step direction. At this temperature, the Si(111) surface bunches at the high rate of approximately 1 step/second 23 and reaches the phase of antiband formation relatively rapidly, compared to other temperature intervals. Normally, two samples of the same miscut were annealed with the same electric field to confirm consistency of the results.…”
Section: A Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quite recently it was realised that step bunching is a promising way to study the interactions between the steps 29,30,31,32,33,34 . The physical ground is simple: The steps in the bunch keep a certain distance from each other because the step-step repulsion balances the tendency to further compression of the bunch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For step bunching induced by surface electromigration, scaling relations of the form (2) have been derived both for non-transparent and transparent steps 26,29,30,34 . Their application to the analysis of experiments 31,32 proceeds in two stages. First, the value of the scaling exponent α or γ is used to determine the kinetic regime and the value of the step interaction exponent n, and subsequently an estimate for the strength of the step-step interaction (in relation to the driving force for step bunching) is extracted from the prefactor of the scaling relation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The the uniform step train remained stable on heating with a step-up current. This instability has a mysterious temperature dependence, 2,3,4,5,6 with three temperature ranges between 830…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%