1995
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(95)80016-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric field dynamics at a metal-semiconductor interface probed by femtosecond optical second harmonic generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with a recent SHG study of Au/GaAs Schottky barriers as a function of junction bias and SHG probe intensity. 15,16 Additionally, our results support the proposal of Yamada, Kimura, and Fuqua that a correlation observed between ''surface-sensitive'' SHG and simultaneously obtained photoluminescence during photowashing of GaAs wafers was due to unpinning of the Fermi level combined with an EFISH contribution to the SHG. 51 It should be noted that the SHG probe in Ref.…”
Section: Relationship To Previous Worksupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is consistent with a recent SHG study of Au/GaAs Schottky barriers as a function of junction bias and SHG probe intensity. 15,16 Additionally, our results support the proposal of Yamada, Kimura, and Fuqua that a correlation observed between ''surface-sensitive'' SHG and simultaneously obtained photoluminescence during photowashing of GaAs wafers was due to unpinning of the Fermi level combined with an EFISH contribution to the SHG. 51 It should be noted that the SHG probe in Ref.…”
Section: Relationship To Previous Worksupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In Ref. 16, it is incorrectly stated that the depletion electric field contributes linearly to b ͑2͒ and c ͑2͒ . Also, note that the contribution can be uniquely determined from the b ͑4͒ and c ͑4͒ terms.…”
Section: ͑19͒mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(and thus time-independent) bulk contribution to the SHG Intensity [7,8]. The inset of the figure shows the same data points but now with the exponential background subtracted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%