2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electricity generation from cattle dung using microbial fuel cell technology during anaerobic acidogenesis and the development of microbial populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative abundance in two phyla: Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria remained at comparable levels in the inoculum and operation of the MFC. The presence of these two phyla was also observed in a two-chamber MFC fed cow manure [34]. that typically produced with acetate, but more similar to previous results when using insoluble cellulose as a substrate [5].…”
Section: Microbial Community Analysissupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relative abundance in two phyla: Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria remained at comparable levels in the inoculum and operation of the MFC. The presence of these two phyla was also observed in a two-chamber MFC fed cow manure [34]. that typically produced with acetate, but more similar to previous results when using insoluble cellulose as a substrate [5].…”
Section: Microbial Community Analysissupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The relative abundance in two phyla: Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria remained at comparable levels in the inoculum and operation of the MFC. The presence of these two phyla was also observed in a two-chamber MFC fed cow manure [34]. At the genus level, in the Bacteroidetes phylum, the most abundant genera were Parabacteroides (relative abundance of 39%) and Proteiniphilum (33%) (Figure 4a).…”
Section: Microbial Community Analysismentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains have also been used along with manipulation of NAD co-factor thereby increasing the metabolic rate and potential of the bacteria toward enhanced biofuel production. Anaerobic acidogenesis of cattle dung revealed Clostridium sp., Pseudomonas luteola and Ochrobactrum pseudogrignonense to be the most dominant groups present responsible for the electricity generation process (Zhao et al 2012). Algal species of Leptolyngbya sp.…”
Section: Micro-organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, inclusion of these waste products as substrates in MFC technology makes it a more potent means of sustainable energy generation. Industrial and domestic wastewaters namely sewage, cattle, swine and brewery wastewaters have been employed as potential substrates in MFC technology generating efficient results (Min et al 2005;Feng et al 2008;Zhao et al 2012). Upgrading these models to a larger scale would aim to decrease the energy expenditure in terms of their treatment .…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microbial fuel cell is a device which generates electricity by the metabolic activities of the microbes. Microorganisms transfer the electrons obtained from the metabolism of organic matters in the anode and thereby to the cathode through an external circuit, hence generate electricity [1,2] .Though a century old technique, which was initially recognized for treatment of wastewater, MFC is gaining its interest for the generation of electricity, bio-hydrogen and also used as biosensor [3,4]. Any biodegradable organic matter ranging from pure compounds such as glycerol, acetate, starch, glucose, cysteine, and ethanol [3,5] to complex mixtures of organic matter such as wastewater [6], cow dung [2], kitchen waste [6] and ionic strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%