2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electro-enhanced removal of copper ions from aqueous solutions by capacitive deionization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the electrosorption isotherms were consistent with both Langmuir and Freundlich models. At applied potential of À0.8 V, the maximum adsorption capacity of the MnO 2 /CF electrode was 172.88 mg/g, which is considerably higher than 56.62 and 24.57 mg/g, the reported electrosorptive Cu 2+ uptake capacities of ordered mesoporous carbon [10] and activated carbon electrodes [6], respectively. The maximum adsorption capacity of Cu 2+ with this composite electrode based on the MnO 2 loading is 2.2 times higher than that [28] of MnO 2 absorbent without an electric field imposed.…”
Section: Electrosorptive Performance In Cumentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was found that the electrosorption isotherms were consistent with both Langmuir and Freundlich models. At applied potential of À0.8 V, the maximum adsorption capacity of the MnO 2 /CF electrode was 172.88 mg/g, which is considerably higher than 56.62 and 24.57 mg/g, the reported electrosorptive Cu 2+ uptake capacities of ordered mesoporous carbon [10] and activated carbon electrodes [6], respectively. The maximum adsorption capacity of Cu 2+ with this composite electrode based on the MnO 2 loading is 2.2 times higher than that [28] of MnO 2 absorbent without an electric field imposed.…”
Section: Electrosorptive Performance In Cumentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Electrosorption is a separation technology combining adsorption and electrochemical methods, used to remove ionic contaminants such as salt ions [1,2], heavy metal ions [3][4][5][6], anions [7], and organics [8,9] from water, and has received extensive attention and support due to its advantages of both waste minimization and reduced processing costs. It has been generally defined as potential-induced adsorption on the surface of charged electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, membrane filtration processes (Ujang and Anderson 1996;Qdais and Moussa 2004) such as ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, reverse osmosis or electrodialysis are utilized. Coagulation, flocculation, flotation (Fu and Wang 2011) as well as electrochemical treatment (Kongsricharoern and Polprasert 1995;Huang et al 2014) are also among those processes. Unfortunately, all of these methods and processes exhibit drawbacks that limit their utility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of arsenate ions by CDI favors lower salinity conditions and high pH [28]. Electrosorption of Cu 2+ ions from aqueous solution by activated carbon electrodes was reported by Huang and coworkers [29]. At comparatively low voltage, electrodeposition of copper is restricted and Cu 2+ ions removal on surface of electrode is due purely to electrostactic interaction in the electrical double-layer created in the nanoporous area.…”
Section: Discussion Of Pollutant Ion Removal By CDImentioning
confidence: 90%