2018
DOI: 10.1002/elan.201700837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrocatalytic Discrimination between Dopamine and Norepinephrine at Graphite and Basal Plane HOPG Electrodes

Abstract: Understanding the regulatory mechanisms of neurotransmission is impossible without in vivo monitoring of neurotransmitters’ (NTs) transformation in the brain, and that can be performed by a variety of electrochemical methods. Close redox potentials of such NTs as catecholamines, however, impede their specific analysis in systems where they do co‐exist. Here, we studied the kinetics of dopamine and norepinephrine redox transformations on glassy carbon, micro‐structured spectroscopic graphite, and basal plane HO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the analysis of the effect of capping ligands on the electrocatalytic performance of NPs-modified electrodes is apparently complicated by the nature of the conductive substrate support, which was already discussed to strongly contribute not only to the NP Fermi level but also to the surface dispersion and aggregation of NPs on the electrode surface. [38] The lower wettability (i. e., higher hydrophobicity) of spectroscopic Gr in combination with its highly micro-structured surface composed of graphitic flakes [54,55] enable electrophoretic deposition of IrO x NPs minimally aggregated and with a maximal specific electrocatalytic activity. Independently of the time of deposition, no solid IrO x NPs films could be formed on the Gr electrodes.…”
Section: Surface Reactivity Of the Gr And Hopg Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the analysis of the effect of capping ligands on the electrocatalytic performance of NPs-modified electrodes is apparently complicated by the nature of the conductive substrate support, which was already discussed to strongly contribute not only to the NP Fermi level but also to the surface dispersion and aggregation of NPs on the electrode surface. [38] The lower wettability (i. e., higher hydrophobicity) of spectroscopic Gr in combination with its highly micro-structured surface composed of graphitic flakes [54,55] enable electrophoretic deposition of IrO x NPs minimally aggregated and with a maximal specific electrocatalytic activity. Independently of the time of deposition, no solid IrO x NPs films could be formed on the Gr electrodes.…”
Section: Surface Reactivity Of the Gr And Hopg Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, electrocatalytic properties of IrO x NPs electrophoretically deposited onto two types of substrate electrodes, spectroscopic Gr that somehow approaches in its properties the edge-plane highly ordered pyrolytic graphite (HOPG), and basal plane HOPG, representing a stack of graphene layers and often considered as a first-approximation electrochemical 3D model of graphene, [49] were investigated. These electrode materials have distinctly different surface properties with respect to hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity, sur-face reactivity [50][51][52][53][54] and surface structural roughness. [55] While the atomically flat surface of HOPG is extremely useful as a substrate for AFM studies, [52,56,57] its reactivity is also very attractive for electrochemical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various materials have been developed and immobilized on the surface of electrodes, including metal oxides or metal oxide-based nanoparticles and nanocomposites, [9,13,14] carbonbased nanomaterials (i. e. carbon nanotubes, [15,16] graphenes, [17][18][19][20] carbon fibers, [21,22] and HOPG [23,24] et al), polymeric materials [25,26] and ionic liquids [27,28] et al, exploring new materials which may have the adsorptive or catalytic behavior for the electrochemical detection of dopamine is still a trend. In addition, the controlled integration of some nanoparticles creates a class of multifunctional nanomaterials that are powerful for various applications, including in the fields of electrocatalysis and sensing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely-accepted that a suitable strategy to improve the selectivity of electrochemical detection could involve the use of modified electrodes able to interact more specifically with neurotransmitters. For this purpose it has been reported the use of polypyrrole films [ 10 ], nickel oxide nanoparticles, or carbon nanotubes within dihexadecylphosphate films [ 11 ], as well as carbon-modified electrodes [ 12 , 13 ]. To our knowledge, the use of silica-based materials for neurotransmitter detection has been restricted to their integration with carbon nanoparticles to enhance sensitivity [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%