2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical sensor based on molecularly imprinted polymer/reduced graphene oxide composite for simultaneous determination of uric acid and tyrosine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A DPV sensor displayed a LOD of 1.3 nM and a linear range from 2 µM to 1000 µM in buffer solution at pH 6.8. Molecular imprinted poly (2-amino-5-mercapto-1, 3, 4-thiadiazole) (PAMT) and reduced graphene oxide (MIP/RGO) composite was used for simultaneous determination of UA and tyrosine obtaining a LOD of 3.2 nM for UA by DPV in PBS at pH 5 [149]. This sensor was tested in urine and serum showing recoveries between 94.0% and 106.0%.…”
Section: Uric Acid (Ua)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A DPV sensor displayed a LOD of 1.3 nM and a linear range from 2 µM to 1000 µM in buffer solution at pH 6.8. Molecular imprinted poly (2-amino-5-mercapto-1, 3, 4-thiadiazole) (PAMT) and reduced graphene oxide (MIP/RGO) composite was used for simultaneous determination of UA and tyrosine obtaining a LOD of 3.2 nM for UA by DPV in PBS at pH 5 [149]. This sensor was tested in urine and serum showing recoveries between 94.0% and 106.0%.…”
Section: Uric Acid (Ua)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MIP layer was electropolymerized by using 2‐amino‐5‐mercapto‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole monomer on the electrode modified by rGO and by immobilizing the dual template of uric acid and tyrosine. They explained the sensing mechanism of biosensor by first the recognition of target molecule and thereafter catalyzation of the oxidation reaction on the composite of MIP/rGO by evaluating the electrochemical behavior of tyrosine and uric acid . Under optimal conditions, the resulting nanocomposite exhibited enhanced electron transfer rate, more recognition binding sites, low limit of detection for tyrosine (0.046 µ m ) and uric acid (0.0032 µ m ), and wide linear range.…”
Section: Intrinsically Conductive Polymer Composites For Biosensing Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of conducting polymers is that CP-based layers can be deposited using well controllable [ 22 ] various electrochemical deposition methods. However, mostly potential cycling, which is followed and controlled by CV [ 15 , 23 , 24 ], and potential pulses, which are followed by chronoamperometry [ 16 , 25 , 26 ], are applied. Both the above mentioned methods are providing a great variety of abilities suitable for the most efficient formation and/or modification of formed sensing layers and simultaneous control of formed structure, therefore, the properties of formed CP-based layers can be changed very precisely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%