2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4919877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrode polarization vs. Maxwell-Wagner-Sillars interfacial polarization in dielectric spectra of materials: Characteristic frequencies and scaling laws

Abstract: The characteristic frequencies of electrode polarization and of interfacial polarization effects in dielectric spectra of ionic liquids and of polymer bi-layers are determined and systematically analyzed, based on dielectric measurements by means of broadband dielectric spectroscopy, numerical simulations, and analytical calculations. It is shown that, to a large extent, identical scaling laws can be derived for these two dielectric phenomena taking place at external and internal interfaces. Surprisingly, a fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
128
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The global dielectric response of a bilayer structure consisting of a conductive and an insulating layer can be calculated by considering the complex permittivity functions (or the complex conductivity functions) of the two phases and their corresponding thicknesses εnet*=Lεcond*εins*dinsεcond*+dcondεins* where εcond*=normalεcondinormalεcond represents the complex dielectric function of the conductive layer, d cond its thickness, εins*=normalεinsinormalεins the complex dielectric function of the insulating layer, d ins its thickness, and L = d ins + d cond represents the total thickness of the polymer sample. Between the complex permittivity function and the complex conductivity function a linear relationship exists, thus, σcond*=inormalωε0εcond*, with σ′ cond = ωε 0 ε″ cond and σ″ cond = ωε 0 ε′ cond , and σins*=inormalωε0εins*, with σ′ ins = ωε 0 ε″ ins and σ″ ins = ωε 0 ε′ ins , ω being the radial frequency of the applied electric field and ε 0 the vacuum permittivity. For the sake of simplicity, the dielectric properties of the samples will be characterized in the subsequent numerical calculations by a pair of two numbers, the dielectric permittivity ε′ and the conductivity σ, with ε′′ = σ/ωε 0 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The global dielectric response of a bilayer structure consisting of a conductive and an insulating layer can be calculated by considering the complex permittivity functions (or the complex conductivity functions) of the two phases and their corresponding thicknesses εnet*=Lεcond*εins*dinsεcond*+dcondεins* where εcond*=normalεcondinormalεcond represents the complex dielectric function of the conductive layer, d cond its thickness, εins*=normalεinsinormalεins the complex dielectric function of the insulating layer, d ins its thickness, and L = d ins + d cond represents the total thickness of the polymer sample. Between the complex permittivity function and the complex conductivity function a linear relationship exists, thus, σcond*=inormalωε0εcond*, with σ′ cond = ωε 0 ε″ cond and σ″ cond = ωε 0 ε′ cond , and σins*=inormalωε0εins*, with σ′ ins = ωε 0 ε″ ins and σ″ ins = ωε 0 ε′ ins , ω being the radial frequency of the applied electric field and ε 0 the vacuum permittivity. For the sake of simplicity, the dielectric properties of the samples will be characterized in the subsequent numerical calculations by a pair of two numbers, the dielectric permittivity ε′ and the conductivity σ, with ε′′ = σ/ωε 0 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effective approach, nevertheless, presents several important drawbacks, such as for instance a very limited electrochemical window and the necessity of sealing the sample cell due to the presence of the liquid electrolyte phase. As opposed to the electrode polarization that take place at the contact with the external electrodes, interfacial polarization effects offer an alternative route to increase the effective permittivity of materials. Composite materials (and, more general, multiphase materials) represent an optimal choice to this approach, because they fulfill the two essential conditions necessary to give rise to the phenomenon of interfacial polarization: (1) the presence of internal interfaces, and (2) the difference in conductivity between the different phases of the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, an additional process appears at higher temperature and is ascribed to the interfacial polarization known as the Maxwell‐Wagner‐Sillars (MWS) effect. This relaxation arises from the accumulation of charge carriers at the interfaces between the MMT particles and PMATRIF matrix deriving a more conductive material depending on the nature, size and the volume fraction of the filler . In order to prove the found relaxation process and to better resolve the overlapping peaks in dielectric loss, another method based on the approximation of the logarithmic derivative of the real dielectric permittivity by the dielectric loss is used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since breakdown strength E B is the utmost E that can be applied to dielectric capacitors, both ε r and E B have to be enhanced simultaneously to obtain high energy density. [16][17][18][19] The high E B and large U of nanocomposites may be attributed to a small leakage current, low dielectric loss, and low interfacial polarization. [11,12] Hence ceramics nanofillers, such as TiO 2 , [13] BaTiO 3 , [14] and Ba x Sr 1−x TiO 3 , [15] are introduced into the polymer matrix to form polymer nanocomposites in order to compensate for each other's deficiencies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19] The high E B and large U of nanocomposites may be attributed to a small leakage current, low dielectric loss, and low interfacial polarization. [16][17][18][19] The high E B and large U of nanocomposites may be attributed to a small leakage current, low dielectric loss, and low interfacial polarization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%