1997
DOI: 10.1109/16.557719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron and hole quantization and their impact on deep submicron silicon p- and n-MOSFET characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our DG results for the quantum mechanical threshold voltage shift, V T (Q M) − V T (Classical), shown in Fig. 11, using the value of electron effective mass, m * = 0.19m 0 , as recommended in [32], are in excellent agreement with the shift reported in [26]. The range of doping concentration used in the comparison corresponds to that of properly scaled MOSFETs with channel lengths below 100 nm.…”
Section: Simulation Approachsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our DG results for the quantum mechanical threshold voltage shift, V T (Q M) − V T (Classical), shown in Fig. 11, using the value of electron effective mass, m * = 0.19m 0 , as recommended in [32], are in excellent agreement with the shift reported in [26]. The range of doping concentration used in the comparison corresponds to that of properly scaled MOSFETs with channel lengths below 100 nm.…”
Section: Simulation Approachsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The increase in doping concentration and reduction in oxide thickness in MOSFETs scaled to sub-100 nm dimensions results in a strong quantization in the inversion layer, with a corresponding increase in the threshold voltage [26]. However, all previous 3D simulation studies of random dopant fluctuation effects [11,15,20] do not take into account quantum effects.…”
Section: Simulation Approachmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At such thickness, the atomic scale roughness of the top and bottom Si/SiO 2 interfaces, that is on the scale of ±1 atomic layer (%0.3 nm) will introduce appreciable variation in the silicon body thickness. Quantum confinement effects that change the position of the electron ground state associated with the body thickness variations and push the inversion layer away from the rough interface, smoothing the spatial inversion charge variations compared to classical simulations [11,12] have to be taken properly into account.…”
Section: Body Thickness Variation (Btv)mentioning
confidence: 99%