1996
DOI: 10.1016/0167-9317(95)00193-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron beam lithography over topography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6f. This result seems to be in contrast to our earlier work [4,5]. In these works we reported on a reduced influence of the proximity effect for a structuring down to 70 nm lines and spaces done with "normal" low-voltage electron-beam lithography (accel.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6f. This result seems to be in contrast to our earlier work [4,5]. In these works we reported on a reduced influence of the proximity effect for a structuring down to 70 nm lines and spaces done with "normal" low-voltage electron-beam lithography (accel.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Many workers report about applications using accelerating voltages of 20 and 30 kV and/or multi-layer resist systems and/or multi exposures, like dose-size split methods [2,3]. An alternative way to produce feature sizes in the sub-100 nm region of metallization layers seems to be the use of a single layer resist system and a low-voltage electron beam lithography [4,5]in combination with a lift-off process. The idea of this approach is to use the lateral scattering of the low voltage electrons to deposit a negative sloped energy density distribution into the resist which results in an undercut of the resist profile after wet development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a result of electrons backscattering from the substrate and changing the feature profile near a topographic step. 26 For different reasons, it is impractical to pattern a wafer with topography with either the STM or AFM. In STM lithography the problem is usually one of beam spreading causing linewidth variations between regions.…”
Section: Patterning Over Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%