2001
DOI: 10.1021/ja004055c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Transport through Thin Organic Films in Metal−Insulator−Metal Junctions Based on Self-Assembled Monolayers

Abstract: This paper describes an experimentally simple system for measuring rates of electron transport across organic thin films having a range of molecular structures. The system uses a metal--insulator--metal junction based on self-assembled monolayers (SAMs); it is particularly easy to assemble. The junction consists of a SAM supported on a silver film (Ag-SAM(1)) in contact with a second SAM supported on the surface of a drop of mercury (Hg-SAM(2))--that is, a Ag-SAM(1)SAM(2)-Hg junction. SAM(1) and SAM(2) can be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

70
668
5
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 603 publications
(747 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
70
668
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Moreover, the energy level of the HOMO of conjugated molecules aligns more favorably with the Fermi level of the metal, than does that for aliphatic molecules, and results in lower tunneling barriers. 16,21,37,38 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION these values agree with previous experimental reports using single-molecule and large-area junctions. 27,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] These results presented here also agree with theoretical calculations by Ratner and coworkers; these authors predict (using density functional theory, DFT) a value of  = ~0.3 Å -1 for SAMs of polyphenyldithiolates by assuming a continuous conjugation of the molecules with the metal electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…21 Moreover, the energy level of the HOMO of conjugated molecules aligns more favorably with the Fermi level of the metal, than does that for aliphatic molecules, and results in lower tunneling barriers. 16,21,37,38 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION these values agree with previous experimental reports using single-molecule and large-area junctions. 27,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] These results presented here also agree with theoretical calculations by Ratner and coworkers; these authors predict (using density functional theory, DFT) a value of  = ~0.3 Å -1 for SAMs of polyphenyldithiolates by assuming a continuous conjugation of the molecules with the metal electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…S10). The current density exponentially decreased as the molecular length of the aryl alkanes increased, thus revealing the tunnelling mechanism 9,20 . Current density (J) plots obtained at several biases as a function of the molecular length (d) are described by the expression Jpexp( À bd), where b is the tunnelling decay coefficient.…”
Section: Molecular Monolayer With Two-terminal Graphene Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recently, stabilised fabrication methods using soft conducting layers [5][6][7] were developed for device miniaturization using molecules. Miniaturization using molecules has also been explored via microscopic and spectroscopic studies of single molecules and molecular monolayers [8][9][10][11] . Realistic organic electrodes that are conductive, flexible and even transparent should form ideal contacts to a molecular monolayer of organic molecules in two-terminal crossbar devices and should ultimately be compatible with current standard electronic circuitry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,4,8 Aromatic molecules are characterized by smaller energy gaps (∼3−5 eV) between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) than those of aliphatic molecules (∼7 eV) of similar length. 2,48 Furthermore, the HOMO of aromatic molecules aligns more favorably with the Fermi level of electrodes than does that of aliphatic molecules; this alignment, in a SAM-based tunneling junction, facilitates charge transport by lowering the effective height of the tunneling barrier. 5 These differences in the electronic properties of aliphatic and aromatic carboxylates are the basis of the differences in β and rates of tunneling.…”
Section: ■ Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%