“…Taking into account the layered structure of the hexagonal phases, a formal analogy can be drawn between the evolution of separate types of bonds (covalent and metallic) for nonequivalent titanium atoms, for example, in Ti 3 AlC 2 and in the proximity of the polar (111) face of cubic TiC (see ref. 20). In both cases, the weakening of the covalent bond Ti-C [for Ti(1) atoms of the alumocarbide or Ti atoms of the outer monolayer of the (111) face of TiC] considerably strengthens the metallicity of the bond as a consequence of redistribution of electrons between the subbands of Ti 3d-C 2p (p-d covalent bond) and Ti 3d, 4s (d-d metallic bond) states.…”