2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.02.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure modification of platinum on titanium nitride resulting in enhanced catalytic activity and durability for oxygen reduction and formic acid oxidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(73 reference statements)
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this approach, we have also attempted to interpret an anomaly found in surface energies of bcc Li by analyzing the strong influence of the second-and third-nearest-neighbor bonds to its surface energies. Notwithstanding, it is expected that the EPP-derived surface energy database in this work serves as a good platform to improve the mathematical construct for a more realistic model for real applications, e.g., supported metal nanocatalysts [47,48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this approach, we have also attempted to interpret an anomaly found in surface energies of bcc Li by analyzing the strong influence of the second-and third-nearest-neighbor bonds to its surface energies. Notwithstanding, it is expected that the EPP-derived surface energy database in this work serves as a good platform to improve the mathematical construct for a more realistic model for real applications, e.g., supported metal nanocatalysts [47,48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 However, the formic acid crossover still significantly limits the performance of DFAFCs. 3,[29][30][31] Formic acid tolerance was measured using Pt and Ru x Se y deposited onto the oxide-carbon composite substrate (TiO 2 /C) in the study conducted by L. Timperman et al 31 The formic acid tolerance was better in the Ru x Se y /C catalyst when compared with that in the Ru x Se y /TiO 2 /C catalyst. 3,[29][30][31] Formic acid tolerance was measured using Pt and Ru x Se y deposited onto the oxide-carbon composite substrate (TiO 2 /C) in the study conducted by L. Timperman et al 31 The formic acid tolerance was better in the Ru x Se y /C catalyst when compared with that in the Ru x Se y /TiO 2 /C catalyst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Several studies have reported on the cathode electrocatalyst, including the Pt-based catalyst modification and non-Pt based catalyst development for DFAFC. 3,[29][30][31] Formic acid tolerance was measured using Pt and Ru x Se y deposited onto the oxide-carbon composite substrate (TiO 2 /C) in the study conducted by L. Timperman et al 31 The formic acid tolerance was better in the Ru x Se y /C catalyst when compared with that in the Ru x Se y /TiO 2 /C catalyst. The Ru x Se y catalyst was more tolerant toward formic acid as compared with the Pt-based catalyst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass activity (MA) and specific activity (SA) of the Pt-M bimetallic alloy nanoclusters can be calculated from the kinetic current density at 0.9 V vs. RHE. Figure 7a, b shows the bar chart comparison of MA and SA of Pt-M bimetallic alloy nanoclusters with selected Pt-based ORR electrocatalysts from recent literatures [18,32,[46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. Among the three Pt-M bimetallic alloy nanoclusters, Pt-Co has higher magnitude of MA (0.44 mA/μg) which meets the DOE target for 2020 [57].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%