1987
DOI: 10.1016/0305-1978(87)90095-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophoretic variability of blood proteins among populations of two genera of african rodents: Arvicanthis and Mastomys from Senegal. Genetic polymorphism and geographic differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(2002), ‘it appears from cytochrome b sequencing data that despite their chromosomal differentiation, West Africa ANI‐1a and ANI‐1b are genetically closer to each other than they are to specimens (ANI‐1a) from Egypt (Ducroz et al ., 1998)’. The minor karyotypic differentiation between the two cytotypes (ANI‐1a and ANI‐1b) was proved to be mostly interfertile in captivity based on west African individuals (Petter et al ., 1969; Kaminski et al ., 1987). Although north‐east African populations have the same ANI‐1a cytotype, they are morphologically and genetically (8.9%) divergent, suggesting a long period of geographical isolation, and it would be useful to conduct breeding tests between Sudanese ANI‐1a and West African ANI‐1a and 1b individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2002), ‘it appears from cytochrome b sequencing data that despite their chromosomal differentiation, West Africa ANI‐1a and ANI‐1b are genetically closer to each other than they are to specimens (ANI‐1a) from Egypt (Ducroz et al ., 1998)’. The minor karyotypic differentiation between the two cytotypes (ANI‐1a and ANI‐1b) was proved to be mostly interfertile in captivity based on west African individuals (Petter et al ., 1969; Kaminski et al ., 1987). Although north‐east African populations have the same ANI‐1a cytotype, they are morphologically and genetically (8.9%) divergent, suggesting a long period of geographical isolation, and it would be useful to conduct breeding tests between Sudanese ANI‐1a and West African ANI‐1a and 1b individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have included cytogenetic (Capanna and Civitelli, 1988;Civitelli et al, 1995;Ducroz et al, 1997;Granjon et al, 1992;Orlov et al, 1992;Volobouev et al, 1988), electrophoretic (Capula et al, 1997;Kaminski et al, 1987), sperm morphology (Baskevich and Lavrenchenko, 1994), DNA/DNA hybridization (Ducroz et al, 1997), morphometrics (Afework Bekele et al, 1993;Corti and Fadda, 1996), and reproductive analyses (Ducroz et al, 1997), but a comprehensive assessment of species limits and interrelationships using a molecular approach was yet to be done. The cyt b proved to be a suitable molecular marker for the resolution of internal relationships within the genus Arvicanthis.…”
Section: Cyt B Gene Sequence and Phylogenetic Informationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It follows from these data that ANI-1a is a paraphyletic assemblage and that ANI-1b, with its metacentric pair 30, undoubtedly represents the derived condition. This minor karyotypic differentiation thus appears of dubious taxonomic value, even more so when considering that ANI-1a and ANI-1b were shown to be inter-fertile in captivity (Kaminski et al, 1987;Petter et al, 1969). One can nevertheless point out the conspicuous karyotypic stability and geographic unity of the ANI-1a and ANI-1b groupings.…”
Section: Proposed Taxonomic Revisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, enzymatic (Kaminski et al, 1984(Kaminski et al, , 1987Capula et al, 1997), chromosomal (Volobouev et al, 1987(Volobouev et al, , 1988Capanna and Civitelli, 1988;Granjon et al, 1992;Civitelli et al, 1995;Capanna et al, 1996;Corti et al, 1996;Ducroz et al, 1997), molecular (Ducroz et al, 1997, and geometrical morphometric (Fadda, 1998;Fadda and Corti, 1998) analyses contradict such a taxonomic arrangement. In particular, chromosome banding studies have revealed the existence of four chromosomal forms, provisionally labeled as ANI-1, ANI-2, ANI-3, and ANI-4 (Ducroz, 1998), differing from each other by a series of chromosomal rearrangements likely to provide strong reproductive isolation, as corroborated between ANI-1 and ANI-3 by laboratory crossbreeding experiments (Ducroz et al, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%