2013
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrospun nanofibers as a bioadhesive platform for capturing adherent leukemia cells

Abstract: This study investigated the adhesive behaviors of normal and abnormal hematopoietic cells on nanotopographical materials. Previously, electrospun nanofiber scaffolds (NFSs) were used to capture and expand hematopoietic stem cells in vitro; here, we demonstrate that NFS could also serve as a useful bioadhesive platform for capturing functionally adherent leukemia cells. Collagen-blended poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) NFS enabled more rapid and efficient capture of K562 leukemia cells than tissue culture polysty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cell Adhesion. NIH3T3 cells tend to get adhered to the surface of the biocompatible materials; therefore the various cell fate processes including proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and differentiation are highly affected by cells adhesion to cell-binding epitopes in the extracellular matrix (ECM) [33]. Figure 8 depicts the FE-SEM images of the NIH3T3 cells adhered to the pristine PLGA and PLGA/CuO hybrid nanofiber scaffolds with different incubation time.…”
Section: Cytocompatibility Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell Adhesion. NIH3T3 cells tend to get adhered to the surface of the biocompatible materials; therefore the various cell fate processes including proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and differentiation are highly affected by cells adhesion to cell-binding epitopes in the extracellular matrix (ECM) [33]. Figure 8 depicts the FE-SEM images of the NIH3T3 cells adhered to the pristine PLGA and PLGA/CuO hybrid nanofiber scaffolds with different incubation time.…”
Section: Cytocompatibility Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different types of materials have been tested for making 3D scaffolds to support hematopoietic cell growth. Nanostructured features such as electrospun nanofibers have also been shown to play a role in capturing and expanding hematopoietic cells in vitro [39][40][41]. We hypothesize that this unique bio-artificial architecture provided in the HFBR better mimics the cellular compartment of human bone marrow, thus stimulating the growth of HSCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A greater cell harvest of primitive hematopoietic population was found in the adherent population in the HFBR culture and this may be attributed to the 3D architecture that the membrane fibers and stromal cells collaboratively created (Fig. Nanostructured features such as electrospun nanofibers have also been shown to play a role in capturing and expanding hematopoietic cells in vitro [39][40][41]. In the context of 3D microenvironments, other groups have also shown that 3D architectures mimicking the osteoblast niche favored the expansion of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells compared to 2D systems [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While our long-term intent is to grow and modulate hematopoietic cells, K562 cells are a good model system for such studies. Although collagen blended poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) nanofiber scaffolds used for capturing adherent K562 cells has been reported [34], there is no report on the cytotoxic evaluation of electrospun PCL nanofibers on K562 cells in the literature.…”
Section: Cytotoxicity Assessment Of Multilayer Nanofiber-hydrogel Meshesmentioning
confidence: 99%