2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elemental fingerprinting of soils using ICP-MS and multivariate statistics: A study for and by forensic chemistry majors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…soils, minerals) have site-specific composition due to differences in parent source material, age and weathering of deposits and other factors [11,16]. Other work that demonstrates the extended use of multivariate statistics and elemental fingerprinting include fingerprinting building material from Roman fortresses [17], investigating paleo-environmental evolution and human activities using the trace element distribution in a peat bog [18], and application of the technique to soil in forensic-related investigations [19]. For gypsum, the trace element distribution is characteristic of its source.…”
Section: Basis Of Elemental Fingerprinting For Provenance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…soils, minerals) have site-specific composition due to differences in parent source material, age and weathering of deposits and other factors [11,16]. Other work that demonstrates the extended use of multivariate statistics and elemental fingerprinting include fingerprinting building material from Roman fortresses [17], investigating paleo-environmental evolution and human activities using the trace element distribution in a peat bog [18], and application of the technique to soil in forensic-related investigations [19]. For gypsum, the trace element distribution is characteristic of its source.…”
Section: Basis Of Elemental Fingerprinting For Provenance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within forensic soil science, techniques for the analysis of the inorganic content within samples have been widely established across many disciplines (1,2,4,6,8,9,20). The most common methods currently utilised include polarised light microscopy for general identification of minerals and rocks (1), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for semi-quantitative comparisons of the elemental composition (10,21,22), and x-ray diffraction (XRD) or scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) for mineral speciation and characterisation of native metals (7,13,23,24). In many methodologies, several techniques are undertaken on separated fractions of soil, allowing further differentiation compared to the bulk chemistry (10,21,23,24).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common methods currently utilised include polarised light microscopy for general identification of minerals and rocks (1), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for semi-quantitative comparisons of the elemental composition (10,21,22), and x-ray diffraction (XRD) or scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) for mineral speciation and characterisation of native metals (7,13,23,24). In many methodologies, several techniques are undertaken on separated fractions of soil, allowing further differentiation compared to the bulk chemistry (10,21,23,24). The comparison of the quartz-recovered fine fraction (primary and secondary minerals < 20 mm found as coatings on quartz grains) is a method recently developed by Pitts and Clarke, which allows for differentiation of minute and fractionated forensic samples (25).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of physical evidence types have been used to help test and establish what had happened at crime scenes, such as DNA, hair, paint, glass, fibers, and plant and soil traces. Although it has recently been more thoroughly investigated (1–3), the use of soil to assist criminal investigations dates back around 150 years ago (4) and even before that to the Roman time when they were reported to examine the hooves of enemies horses to work out where they had travelled. The use of soils in forensic investigations can be a valuable source of information due to its variable nature and the ability to ascertain the likely origin of soil traces adherent to a wide range of objects and people, including shoes, tires, clothes, and hair (5–9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical extractions have been frequently used in forensic studies: for example, total extraction and analysis by ICP‐OES/AES‐MS (1,3,12); organic extractions (2,13,14). All of these chemical methods were applied to an isolated matrix of the soil.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%