2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26618-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevating density functional theory to chemical accuracy for water simulations through a density-corrected many-body formalism

Abstract: Density functional theory (DFT) has been extensively used to model the properties of water. Albeit maintaining a good balance between accuracy and efficiency, no density functional has so far achieved the degree of accuracy necessary to correctly predict the properties of water across the entire phase diagram. Here, we present density-corrected SCAN (DC-SCAN) calculations for water which, minimizing density-driven errors, elevate the accuracy of the SCAN functional to that of “gold standard” coupled-cluster th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
74
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
(168 reference statements)
3
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Herein, DC-DFT is employed in the form of HF-DFT, and we preserve the DC-DFT notation, since the HF density is a good proxy for the exact density in a water cluster. DC-SCAN has recently been found to improve the accuracy of DFT calculations for water, effectively elevating the accuracy of the SCAN functional to that of coupled cluster theory, the “gold standard” for chemical accuracy . DC-SCAN does not achieve this level of accuracy for all systems, but it is overall somewhat more accurate than self-consistent SCAN for a large and diverse data set of main-group molecular properties …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein, DC-DFT is employed in the form of HF-DFT, and we preserve the DC-DFT notation, since the HF density is a good proxy for the exact density in a water cluster. DC-SCAN has recently been found to improve the accuracy of DFT calculations for water, effectively elevating the accuracy of the SCAN functional to that of coupled cluster theory, the “gold standard” for chemical accuracy . DC-SCAN does not achieve this level of accuracy for all systems, but it is overall somewhat more accurate than self-consistent SCAN for a large and diverse data set of main-group molecular properties …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the case of ions, and depending on their charge and size could be strongly hydrated or disrupt the structure of the surrounding water hydrogen bonding [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Ion hydration is a key point in understanding a variety of physicochemical processes; thus both experimental and theoretical studies are seeking to give a definitive picture of how ions influence the water molecules around them [ 10 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ]. On the one hand, it has been possible to obtain a clearer approximation of specific structure effects thanks to neutron and X-ray diffraction experiments [ 4 , 6 , 16 , 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaction potentials can be parameterized either from experimental data or first-principles values, with the latter representing a more adequate way to reproduce energies, as they are not biased by the subsequent reinterpretation that must be made of the laboratory data. Indeed, very valuable information has been obtained from numerous quantum chemistry calculations of water and ion–water clusters [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ], at different levels of theory; however, they are usually limited to a few water molecules systems. A systematic analysis of the cluster properties as a function of its size provides a protocol for the selection of the best computational method for modeling ion–water interactions when going from systems in gas to condensed phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density-driven errors (whether they arise from self-interaction errors or other "delocalization" errors [101]) tend to dominate the errors of DFAs in hydrogen-bonded networks. For example, applying a "density-correction" to SCAN (in this case, evaluating SCAN on the Hartree-Fock density) reduces SCAN's MAE in the binding energies of water clusters from a few kcal/mol to less than 1 kcal/mol [131]. The empirical ωB97M-V (a range-separated hybrid based on the B97M-V meta-GGA) has the lowest WTMAD-2 on the GMKTN55 of any hybrid at 3.53 kcal/mol, but makes a 35.02 kcal/mol MAE on the MB16-43 set [119], much higher than the 12.1 kcal/mol r 2 SCAN MAE.…”
Section: Ascending the Ladder In Real Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%