This article summarizes technical advances contained in the fifth major release of the Q-Chem quantum chemistry program package, covering developments since 2015. A comprehensive library of exchange–correlation functionals, along with a suite of correlated many-body methods, continues to be a hallmark of the Q-Chem software. The many-body methods include novel variants of both coupled-cluster and configuration-interaction approaches along with methods based on the algebraic diagrammatic construction and variational reduced density-matrix methods. Methods highlighted in Q-Chem 5 include a suite of tools for modeling core-level spectroscopy, methods for describing metastable resonances, methods for computing vibronic spectra, the nuclear–electronic orbital method, and several different energy decomposition analysis techniques. High-performance capabilities including multithreaded parallelism and support for calculations on graphics processing units are described. Q-Chem boasts a community of well over 100 active academic developers, and the continuing evolution of the software is supported by an “open teamware” model and an increasingly modular design.
Density-functional approximations developed in the past decade necessitate the use of quadrature grids that are far more dense than those required to integrate older generations of functionals. This category of difficult-to-integrate functionals includes meta-generalized gradient approximations, which depend on orbital gradients and/or the Laplacian of the density, as well as functionals based on B97 and the popular "Minnesota" class of functionals, each of which contain complicated and/or oscillatory expressions for the exchange inhomogeneity factor. Following a strategy introduced previously by Gill and co-workers to develop the relatively sparse "SG-0" and "SG-1" standard quadrature grids, we introduce two higher-quality grids that we designate SG-2 and SG-3, obtained by systematically "pruning" medium- and high-quality atom-centered grids. The pruning procedure affords computational speedups approaching a factor of two for hybrid functionals applied to systems of ∼100 atoms, without significant loss of accuracy. The grid dependence of several popular density functionals is characterized for various properties. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Density functional theory (DFT) has been extensively used to model the properties of water. Albeit maintaining a good balance between accuracy and efficiency, no density functional has so far achieved the degree of accuracy necessary to correctly predict the properties of water across the entire phase diagram. Here, we present density-corrected SCAN (DC-SCAN) calculations for water which, minimizing density-driven errors, elevate the accuracy of the SCAN functional to that of “gold standard” coupled-cluster theory. Building upon the accuracy of DC-SCAN within a many-body formalism, we introduce a data-driven many-body potential energy function, MB-SCAN(DC), that quantitatively reproduces coupled cluster reference values for interaction, binding, and individual many-body energies of water clusters. Importantly, molecular dynamics simulations carried out with MB-SCAN(DC) also reproduce the properties of liquid water, which thus demonstrates that MB-SCAN(DC) is effectively the first DFT-based model that correctly describes water from the gas to the liquid phase.
According to the conventional picture, the aqueous or “hydrated” electron, e –(aq), occupies an excluded volume (cavity) in the structure of liquid water. However, simulations with certain one-electron models predict a more delocalized spin density for the unpaired electron, with no distinct cavity structure. It has been suggested that only the latter (non-cavity) structure can explain the hydrated electron’s resonance Raman spectrum, although this suggestion is based on calculations using empirical frequency maps developed for neat liquid water, not for e –(aq). All-electron ab initio calculations presented here demonstrate that both cavity and non-cavity models of e –(aq) afford significant red-shifts in the O–H stretching region. This effect is nonspecific and arises due to electron penetration into frontier orbitals of the water molecules. Only the conventional cavity model, however, reproduces the splitting of the H–O–D bend (in isotopically mixed water) that is observed experimentally and arises due to the asymmetric environments of the hydroxyl moieties in the electron’s first solvation shell. We conclude that the cavity model of e –(aq) is more consistent with the measured resonance Raman spectrum than is the delocalized, non-cavity model, despite previous suggestions to the contrary. Furthermore, calculations with hybrid density functionals and with Hartree–Fock theory predict that non-cavity liquid geometries afford only unbound (continuum) states for an extra electron, whereas in reality this energy level should lie more than 3 eV below vacuum level. As such, the non-cavity model of e –(aq) appears to be inconsistent with available vibrational spectroscopy, photoelectron spectroscopy, and quantum chemistry.
Density functional theory (DFT) is the most widely used electronic structure method, due to its simplicity and cost effectiveness. The accuracy of a DFT calculation depends not only on the choice of the density functional approximation (DFA) adopted but also on the electron density produced by the DFA. SCAN is a modern functional that satisfies all known constraints for meta-GGA functionals. The density-driven errors, defined as energy errors arising from errors of the self-consistent DFA electron density, can hinder SCAN from achieving chemical accuracy in some systems, including water. Density-corrected DFT (DC-DFT) can alleviate this shortcoming by adopting a more accurate electron density which, in most applications, is the electron density obtained at the Hartree–Fock level of theory due to its relatively low computational cost. In this work, we present extensive calculations aimed at determining the accuracy of the DC-SCAN functional for various aqueous systems. DC-SCAN (SCAN@HF) shows remarkable consistency in reproducing reference data obtained at the coupled cluster level of theory, with minimal loss of accuracy. Density-driven errors in the description of ionic aqueous clusters are thoroughly investigated. By comparison with the orbital-optimized CCD density in the water dimer, we find that the self-consistent SCAN density transfers a spurious fraction of an electron across the hydrogen bond to the hydrogen atom (H*, covalently bound to the donor oxygen atom) from the acceptor (OA) and donor (OD) oxygen atoms, while HF makes a much smaller spurious transfer in the opposite direction, consistent with DC-SCAN (SCAN@HF) reduction of SCAN overbinding due to delocalization error. While LDA seems to be the conventional extreme of density delocalization error, and HF the conventional extreme of (usually much smaller) density localization error, these two densities do not quite yield the conventional range of density-driven error in energy differences. Finally, comparisons of the DC-SCAN results with those obtained with the Fermi-Löwdin orbital self-interaction correction (FLOSIC) method show that DC-SCAN represents a more accurate approach to reducing density-driven errors in SCAN calculations of ionic aqueous clusters. While the HF density is superior to that of SCAN for noncompact water clusters, the opposite is true for the compact water molecule with exactly 10 electrons.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.