2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(00)00324-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ELISA and fecal culture for paratuberculosis (Johne's disease): sensitivity and specificity of each method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
299
2
15

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 335 publications
(333 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
17
299
2
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Kim et al (2004) assumed that faecal culture was an ineffective method for the detection of low bacterial shedders and according to Whitlock et al (2000) the sensitivity of the method for such animals may be as low as 33%. Giese and Ahrens (2000) established 100 CFU/g faeces as a detection limit for culture examination.…”
Section: Culture Examination Of Faecesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al (2004) assumed that faecal culture was an ineffective method for the detection of low bacterial shedders and according to Whitlock et al (2000) the sensitivity of the method for such animals may be as low as 33%. Giese and Ahrens (2000) established 100 CFU/g faeces as a detection limit for culture examination.…”
Section: Culture Examination Of Faecesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally assumed that poor diagnostic-test sensitivity [13] leading to incomplete culling where some infectious animals remain in the herd and environmental persistence of MAP bacteria [14,15] contribute to the sustained prevalence of MAP in herds despite intervention attempts. However, our previous series of mathematical models indicated that, with current assumptions of shedding patterns, infectious contributions of adult shedders alone were insufficient to explain infection persistence and the observed pattern of infection prevalence [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the animals were tested (s = 1) through pooled fecal culture, which was assumed to have a perfect specificity (SP = 1) and a sensitivity (SE) of 0.33 [13,20]. The duration of the scheme (d) was four years.…”
Section: Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the identification of herds at low risk to be infected is difficult for two main reasons. First, diagnostic tests to detect paratuberculosis-infected cattle have a poor negative predictive value due to a low sensitivity of tests [20]. Cattle remain sub-clinical for a long time after infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%