2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icacci.2016.7732142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elitism based Shuffled Frog Leaping algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here results depict that ISFLA is better at accuracy and efficiency level in comparison of GSA, SMO and DE. Boxplot analysis of average number of function evaluations (AFE) can also be designed for the comparison of considered algorithms ISFLA, GSA, SMO and DE [12]. The boxplot is a graphical representation of data, in which rectangle is drawn to represent the interquartile with a vertical line indicating the median value.…”
Section: B Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here results depict that ISFLA is better at accuracy and efficiency level in comparison of GSA, SMO and DE. Boxplot analysis of average number of function evaluations (AFE) can also be designed for the comparison of considered algorithms ISFLA, GSA, SMO and DE [12]. The boxplot is a graphical representation of data, in which rectangle is drawn to represent the interquartile with a vertical line indicating the median value.…”
Section: B Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SFLA combines the global breadth search of the entire frog populations and the local depth search of frogs individual information, leading the algorithm towards the global optimum direction [25,31]. The frog representing the solution is divided into several subgroups, and each population has its own culture.…”
Section: Shuffled Frog Leapingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MED is also a valid approach to the period estimation problem [23]. However, given strong noise, the failure impact component will be lost by MED, and this is because of the following reasons [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%