2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-7757(03)00361-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ellipsometric studies of nonionic block copolymers adsorbed at the solid/water and oil/water interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
16
3
Order By: Relevance
“…PEO star polymers adsorbed in single-shot experiments showed a high affinity adsorption isotherm on silica, with a plateau surface excess concentration of approximately 2.7 ± 0.15 mg/m 2 , whereas the high molecular weight linear PEO adsorption maximum was approximately 0.7 ± 0.04 mg/m 2 . The latter is consistent with literature values for high molecular weight PEO adsorption to silica. The PEO arms account for approximately 80 wt % of the star structure, so 2.7 mg/m 2 corresponds to a surface excess concentration of approximately 2.2 mg/m 2 of PEO, which is still three times the amount of PEO adsorption achieved by the linear polymer. This enhancement of PEO adsorption does not happen with amphiphilic, PEO-containing nonionic block copolymers on silica in water, as noted above …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…PEO star polymers adsorbed in single-shot experiments showed a high affinity adsorption isotherm on silica, with a plateau surface excess concentration of approximately 2.7 ± 0.15 mg/m 2 , whereas the high molecular weight linear PEO adsorption maximum was approximately 0.7 ± 0.04 mg/m 2 . The latter is consistent with literature values for high molecular weight PEO adsorption to silica. The PEO arms account for approximately 80 wt % of the star structure, so 2.7 mg/m 2 corresponds to a surface excess concentration of approximately 2.2 mg/m 2 of PEO, which is still three times the amount of PEO adsorption achieved by the linear polymer. This enhancement of PEO adsorption does not happen with amphiphilic, PEO-containing nonionic block copolymers on silica in water, as noted above …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The areas occupied by one molecule are close to the values reported earlier for PE10500, i.e., 4.0 nm 2 [13], and for PE6800, i.e., 8.7 nm 2 [9], and roughly follow the order of molecular weight of the Pluronics. These adsorption results indicated that the order of the adsorption ability of the Pluronics examined in the present study on a hydrophobic solid surface is PE10300 >> PE10500 $ PE6400 > PE6800.…”
Section: Adsorption Measured By Owlssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Due to the biocompatible character of PEO-containing coatings applied to various biomaterials, interest has focused on the properties of adsorbed Pluronic layers and their role in reducing nonspecific protein adsorption and cell adhesion on biomaterial surfaces [4À7]. The interfacial adsorption behavior of block copolymer surfactants from solutions has been extensively studied [8,9]. Their amphiphilic nature arises from the different solubilities of the copolymer blocks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming a saturated surface area per molecule of 1.44 nm 2 for PF68 (i.e., 1.03 × 10 20 nm 2 · g −1 ),24 in a good agreement with results reported by Alexandridis et al,25 the surface coverage, A S , by the polymer surfactant could be estimated as 7.4 nm 2 if using PF68 alone. Some higher values of the surface area per molecule have also been reported for PF68, namely 5.323 and 8.7 nm 2 26. These values seem too high with respect to the values reported for the other copolymers in order to agree with the N EO1/2 dependence, but using the highest value, however, leads to a theoretical A S / A P (where A P is the surface area of the particles) ratio of around unity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%