2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elucidating Allosteric Communications in Proteins with Difference Contact Network Analysis

Abstract: A difference contact network analysis (dCNA) method is developed for delineating allosteric mechanisms in proteins. The new method addresses limitations of conventional network analysis methods and is particularly suitable for allosteric systems undergoing large-amplitude conformational changes during function. Tests show that dCNA works well for proteins of varying sizes and functions. The design of dCNA is general enough to facilitate analyses of diverse dynamic data generated by molecular dynamics, crystall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contact probability differences were considered significant if their absolute values were greater than the estimated statistical error (0.1) (66) and the two residues were at least three amino acid apart ( i to i + n , n ≥ 3). Residue-residue contacts were further used to identify intrinsic modular structures, or communities, of αβGC cat as previously described (40), which in turn summarized residue wise contact changes by calculating net contact changes between communities. The network analysis and associated graphics generation were performed with bio3d 2.3 (68, 69) and igraph 1.2 (70).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact probability differences were considered significant if their absolute values were greater than the estimated statistical error (0.1) (66) and the two residues were at least three amino acid apart ( i to i + n , n ≥ 3). Residue-residue contacts were further used to identify intrinsic modular structures, or communities, of αβGC cat as previously described (40), which in turn summarized residue wise contact changes by calculating net contact changes between communities. The network analysis and associated graphics generation were performed with bio3d 2.3 (68, 69) and igraph 1.2 (70).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSNs have been shown to have the potential for bridging graph theory concepts and mechanisms of protein systems. Such connection not only enriches the statistical analysis of networks by providing a class of practical networks with unique properties, but also assists a better (quantitative) understanding of structure–function relationships in proteins [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The cutoff itself depends on the kind of structure representation. If connectivity is derived based on atomistic structures, cutoff distances are usually assumed in the range between 4.0 and 5.5 Å 12,24‐31 . In turn, for coarse grained representation R c values between 7 and 8.5 Å are adopted 9‐11,14,32,33 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%