2016 IEEE International Test Conference (ITC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/test.2016.7805834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMACS: Efficient MBIST architecture for test and characterization of STT-MRAM arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) BIST Techniques: BIST techniques presented in [80]- [82] were developed to perform in situ, statistical, retention failure testing of large STT-MRAM arrays.…”
Section: ) Test Generation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) BIST Techniques: BIST techniques presented in [80]- [82] were developed to perform in situ, statistical, retention failure testing of large STT-MRAM arrays.…”
Section: ) Test Generation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to alleviate the retention test time problem, Yoon et al [80], Yoon and Raychowdhury [81], and Hamdioui et al [82] proposed a new MBIST architecture that performs retention testing of large STT-MRAM arrays in a time-efficient manner. The proposed MBIST scheme reduces retention time considerably by: 1) applying weak write current to multiple rows in an array and 2) conducting a read operation only when a fault is detected within the rows under test.…”
Section: ) Test Generation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, a spot defect in an electronic circuit is modeled as a linear resistor, and the defect strength is represented by its resistance value [12,13,52]. For instance, missing material is modeled as a disconnection, while extra material is modeled as an undesired connection.…”
Section: Modeling Of Defects In Interconnects and Contactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, MTJ-related defects irrespective of their physical natures are modeled as linear resistors either in series with (i.e., OC t in Table 4) or in parallel (i.e., S1 BL-IN in Table 5) to an idea defect-free MTJ device, as can be found in [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Comparing the fault modeling results of our proposed pinhole defect model (PH) with the series resistor model OC t and the parallel resistor model S1 BL-IN reveals the following.…”
Section: Pinhole Defects In Mtj Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation