2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2015.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embedded platform for local image descriptor based object detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it is important to compare our proposed cosine angle distance approach for descriptor matching with other implementations in the literature. There are several matching techniques based on different approaches such as calculating the Chi-square distances [9], Sum of Absolute Differences (SAD) [8], and calculating Hamming distances [11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, it is important to compare our proposed cosine angle distance approach for descriptor matching with other implementations in the literature. There are several matching techniques based on different approaches such as calculating the Chi-square distances [9], Sum of Absolute Differences (SAD) [8], and calculating Hamming distances [11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the number of Hamming distance calculation cores increases, the number of resources utilization increases. Table 2 shows the utilized resources of our proposed SIFT matching core using cosine angle distance versus other matching methods such as Chi-square distance [9], SAD calculators [8] and Hamming distance [11]. Compared to these recent works [9,8,11] of implementation of matching cores on hardware, our proposed architecture consumes significantly fewer resources with acceptable matching accuracy ( 98%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feature descriptor mentioned above is a binary string that provides increased storage and matching speed. The traditional matching method often utilizes the brute force (BF) [ 29 ] algorithm to match the feature points, which is followed by the RANSAC algorithm to eliminate mismatches. It is effective for normal scenes [ 30 ].…”
Section: Feature Selection and Matching Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the keypoints are detected and features are described, they are then used to match between the test and the reference images, the process called featurematching. Feature matching methods traditionally use the k-nearest neighbor (kNN) [3] or the brute force algorithm [18] to match the features points. Then an outlier detection algorithm such as random sample consensus (RANSAC) [13] is used to eliminate mismatches or outliers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%