Emotions in Politics

Abstract

The study of emotion in politics has been active, especially as it relates to the personality of political leaders and as an explanation for how people evaluate significant features around them. Researchers have been divided into two groups-those who study leaders and those who study publics. The research programs have also been divided between those who use emotion to explain reliance on early experience that dominates contemporary judgment and those who use emotion to explain why people respond to the immediate contemporary circumstances around them. More recently, theory and research have attempted to reconcile these two seemingly contradictory roles by integrating them. Emotion's role in politics is pervasive both because emotion enables past experience to be encoded with its evaluative history and because emotion enables contemporary circumstances to be quickly evaluated. More recently still, theoretical models and supporting evidence suggest that there are multiple channels of emotional evaluations.

Discussing Occupy Wall Street on Twitter: Longitudinal Network Analysis of Equality, Emotion, and Stability of Public Discussion

“…The perspective of previous studies has shifted from a cognitive-only approach to a cognitive-plus-affective approach, 27 which gives the emotional component of attitudes more weight. Over the past two decades, research on emotion has exploded.…”

“…27 In addition to that, it plays a central role in evaluating and taking action in social movements, because it is capable of stirring people up and causing them to abandon habitual commitments. Schemer et al find that anger enhances political participation, while fear weakens participation.…”

Stopping Mass Atrocities: Targeting the Dictator

“…Limits result from the human capabilities to calculate all options rationally, stem from biases and the decision making process can be distorted by emotions (Marcus, 2000;McDermott, 2004a;Mintz & DeRouen, 2010;Renshon & Renshon, 2008;Rosati, 2000). 5 Considering these limits, it has been argued it is more useful to speak of bounded rationality (Simon, 1985).…”

News With an Attitude: Assessing the Mechanisms Underlying the Effects of Opinionated News

“…Although still frequently overlooked, emotions have been shown to be independent determinants of attitudes in general (Crites et al, 1994), and political attitudes more specifically (Marcus, 2000;Ottati et al, 1992). There are two explanations why anger would negatively affect the persuasiveness of news coverage.…”