Empirical Evidence Governance Innovation in Public Service

Abstract

Innovation in government activities is more directed in public services, although innovation can emphasize processes, development, planning, policies, and other activities. This research discusses governance innovation from empirical evidence that applied innovation cannot provide maximum results. The cause, government innovation that is not realized, appears only as a ceremonial act in government activities. Qualitative method analysis describes experiences, perceptions, responses through facts found in the informant's experience. This study was conducted in the Population and Civil Registration Record Office of Southeast Aceh Regency, starting from September to November 2020. In-depth interviews conducted with informants of this research consisted of government or executive, legislative, related institution, and citizen. Our field findings use the technique of hermeneutics to interpret various views that we can learn to look at the subject from every angle of knowledge (public administration, management, politics, innovation, and technology). That innovation should be supported by policies that result from decision-making, manager expertise, developed through long-term evaluation, and innovation as the basis for the quality of government public services. Governance innovation focuses on innovative action through various government instruments that lead to the simplification of action towards quality public services. For this reason, government, innovation, and how to manage are modes that continue to exist in administrative reform in government institutions with governance innovation that influence each other.

Opportunity of Implementing Buy the Service (BTS) Subsidies for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) to Improve the Quality of Public Transport Services in Padang Panjang City

“…Based on considerations of demand analysis, planned main route routes, and subsidy costs for implementing BTS on BRT in Padang Panjang City, it is concluded that implementing BTS on BRT can be implemented in Padang Panjang City. However, it requires the political will of the regional head (Sudrajat & Andhika, 2021) took over the operation of public transport by the local government with Buy the Service. In addition, in implementing this policy, it is necessary to pay attention to several things, namely: ongoing outreach to the public regarding the ease and convenience of using BRT and equalization of perceptions between local governments and operators regarding the mechanism for providing BRT subsidies.…”

Public sector innovation in local government and its impact on development outcomes: Empirical evidence in Indonesia

“…Apart from the dominant characteristics of innovation in the private sector supported by a competitive environment in accordance with market signals, including investment in research and development (R&D) [ 2 ], innovation in the public sector also plays a critical role in economic development agenda [ 26 , 34 , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] ]. The public sector has specific responsibility to its community as it is funded by public revenues (generally tax revenues).…”

Digitalizing Governance in South Sumatera: An Introduction “E-Sumsel” System Reforming Public Service Management

“…In other words, the reform of the bureaucracy, public services, and public management carried out by the government has fundamentally changed with measurable targets and clear outputs for all institutions nationally (A. Sudrajat & Andhika, 2021). In other words, the reform of the bureaucracy, public services, and public management carried out by the government has fundamentally changed with measurable targets and clear outputs for all institutions nationally.…”