2001
DOI: 10.3386/w8281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employment, Dynamic Deterrence and Crime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, many researches have incorporated new paradigms to explain the mechanisms that cause crime. New research studies the existing relationship between illegal behavior and social interaction (Grogger, 1997;Imai and Krishna, 2001;Lochner, 2001;Witte and Witt, 2001;inter alia). Another example is the work that links factors related to family situations or heritages to crime (Levitt, 1996;Mocan and Ress, 1999).…”
Section: Brief Comments On the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, many researches have incorporated new paradigms to explain the mechanisms that cause crime. New research studies the existing relationship between illegal behavior and social interaction (Grogger, 1997;Imai and Krishna, 2001;Lochner, 2001;Witte and Witt, 2001;inter alia). Another example is the work that links factors related to family situations or heritages to crime (Levitt, 1996;Mocan and Ress, 1999).…”
Section: Brief Comments On the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incorporation of a lagged dependent variable (LDV) has benefited the intention to explore lasting effects and are in line with previous research (e.g. Buonanno and Montolio 2008;Caudill et al 2013;Corman and Mocan 2000;Entorf and Spengler 2008;Imai and Krishna 2004;Mustard 2003;Oliver '02 2002). The lagged variable in the first regression specification is statistically significant.…”
Section: Fraudmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Increasing the number of prosecutors should have a negative effect on fraud, however, not significantly. The coefficient for unemployment is also not significant, but indicates that a decrease in the unemployment rate might change the perception of people's future and therefore public policies regarding employment could reduce criminal behavior significantly (Imai and Krishna 2004). However, there is no evidence that economic variables do have a significant deterrent effect.…”
Section: Fraudmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In a recent paper, however, Glaeser et al (1996) explored the idea that social influences can explain cross-city crime rates in the United States. Other recent attempts to consider the impact of social interactions on criminal behavior include Grogger (1997), Imai and Krishna (2001), Lochner (1999) and Witte and Witt (2001). In all cases, the basic idea is that social interaction variables such as strong family links, marital status, frequency of church attendance among others, affect the probability of an individual engaging in an illegal behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%