“…Even where attempts are made at local level to create genuinely participatory spaces, as observed earlier with reference to the NDC these can be circumscribed by government priorities and targets (Dinham, 2005;Spicer and Evans, 2006;Wright et al, 2006). The importance of feedback and follow-up emerges from analysis of participatory initiatives generally as well as those with marginalised groups (Kirby with Bryson, 2002;Kirby et al, 2003;Barnes et al, 2004;Newman et al, 2004;Beresford and Hoban, 2005).…”
Section: Participation Must Be Genuine: Open Agendas and Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One consequence of acknowledgement of the right not to participate is the need to create better links of accountability between those who do participate and other members of the community (Dinham, 2005;Skidmore et al, 2006). This helps to address accusations that those who do participate are not 'representative' (Taylor, M., 2006) -an issue frequently raised with respect to both children and people living in poverty (Lansdown, 2001(Lansdown, , 2006Maguire and Truscott, 2006).…”
Section: Create and Strengthen Accountability Linksmentioning
The article begins with an account of the values that might underpin an inclusive model of citizenship. It then discusses such a model in terms of participation in policy-making. It does so with particular reference to two groups who are the named objects of policy-making but who are marginalised in the policy-making process: people living in poverty and children. These examples are also used to draw out some general lessons and themes. The article concludes by linking the discussion to the idea of social justice understood as embodying relations of recognition as well as distribution.
“…Even where attempts are made at local level to create genuinely participatory spaces, as observed earlier with reference to the NDC these can be circumscribed by government priorities and targets (Dinham, 2005;Spicer and Evans, 2006;Wright et al, 2006). The importance of feedback and follow-up emerges from analysis of participatory initiatives generally as well as those with marginalised groups (Kirby with Bryson, 2002;Kirby et al, 2003;Barnes et al, 2004;Newman et al, 2004;Beresford and Hoban, 2005).…”
Section: Participation Must Be Genuine: Open Agendas and Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One consequence of acknowledgement of the right not to participate is the need to create better links of accountability between those who do participate and other members of the community (Dinham, 2005;Skidmore et al, 2006). This helps to address accusations that those who do participate are not 'representative' (Taylor, M., 2006) -an issue frequently raised with respect to both children and people living in poverty (Lansdown, 2001(Lansdown, , 2006Maguire and Truscott, 2006).…”
Section: Create and Strengthen Accountability Linksmentioning
The article begins with an account of the values that might underpin an inclusive model of citizenship. It then discusses such a model in terms of participation in policy-making. It does so with particular reference to two groups who are the named objects of policy-making but who are marginalised in the policy-making process: people living in poverty and children. These examples are also used to draw out some general lessons and themes. The article concludes by linking the discussion to the idea of social justice understood as embodying relations of recognition as well as distribution.
“…BAME groups and gender are a topic of deep-rooted concern often expressed through unease about the asserted (Lawless, 2004). It has also been differentiated from previous initiatives, as Government sought to redress past mistakes such as a lack of local ownership, of accountability and of long-term sustainability in neighbourhood renewal (Dinham, 2005;Lawless, 2004).…”
Section: Images Of Women Ethnicity and Multiculturalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a logic that community engagement will enable local knowledge to enhance policy-making but it sits in uneasy tension with professional claims to knowledge. Evaluation of the NDC programme has questioned the possibility of deprived communities fully engaging in area-based regeneration given their lack of power in the face of a Government-led agenda (Lawless, 2004;Jones, 2003;Dinham, 2005). Others argue that it is a "miracle" people in deprived areas get involved at all given the pressures of their everyday lives (Blakeley and Evans, 2008).…”
Section: Images Of Women Ethnicity and Multiculturalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experiences are not unusual (see for example Dinham, 2005;Dargan, 2009) and despite the Government's rhetoric of learning from past mistakes, the NDC community representatives related to a perception of being 'less than equal' within the Board.…”
Section: Experiences On the Board: Power Influence And Discriminationmentioning
Across the EU, neighbourhoods have been the focus for achieving social cohesion and reducing social exclusion. Neighbourhood renewal and community involvement were central themes in the UK Labour government’s urban policy. This article focuses on the challenge of community engagement given the heterogeneity of individuals and neighbourhoods. It uses the case study of a New Deal for Communities (NDC) partnership to explore the experiences of different women on an NDC board, including those from minority ethnic groups. The NDC in the case study provides optimism about the possibility of including diverse groups and people in neighbourhood governance, yet too little attention is still given at both national policy and neighbourhood levels to working politically and productively with concepts of ethnicity and gender.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.