2013
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201209025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enantioselective Separation on Naturally Chiral Metal Surfaces: d,l‐Aspartic Acid on Cu(3,1,17)R&S Surfaces

Abstract: Unequivocal evidence of enantioselective, equilibrium separation of a racemic mixture on a naturally chiral metal surface is presented for the first time. The enantioselectivity is much higher than that of chiral molecules on mineral surfaces. Furthermore, the quantitative nature of the 13C labeling method provides the first direct measure of an enantiospecific adsorption energy difference on a chiral metal surface.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
105
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first point to make is that the magnitudes of the enantiospecificities are all on the order of ∆∆ − E~1 S R des kJ mole −1 or ~0.3 RT at the temperature measured. To put this in perspective, an enantiospecificity of 1 kJ mole −1 corresponds to an enantiospecific difference of rate constants or equilibrium constants of ~35% at 300 K. This magnitude is consistent with other such measurements on naturally chiral metal surfaces: propylene oxide on Cu(6 4 3) R&S [16], lysine on Cu (3,1,17) R&S [20], and aspartic acid on Cu (3,1,17) R&S [21]. The greatest enantiospecific desorption energy measured to date is that of methyl lactate on Cu(6 4 3) R&S , ∆∆ ≈ E des 4 kJ mole −1 [30].…”
Section: Structure Sensitive Enantiospecific Adsorption On Cu(hkl) Randsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The first point to make is that the magnitudes of the enantiospecificities are all on the order of ∆∆ − E~1 S R des kJ mole −1 or ~0.3 RT at the temperature measured. To put this in perspective, an enantiospecificity of 1 kJ mole −1 corresponds to an enantiospecific difference of rate constants or equilibrium constants of ~35% at 300 K. This magnitude is consistent with other such measurements on naturally chiral metal surfaces: propylene oxide on Cu(6 4 3) R&S [16], lysine on Cu (3,1,17) R&S [20], and aspartic acid on Cu (3,1,17) R&S [21]. The greatest enantiospecific desorption energy measured to date is that of methyl lactate on Cu(6 4 3) R&S , ∆∆ ≈ E des 4 kJ mole −1 [30].…”
Section: Structure Sensitive Enantiospecific Adsorption On Cu(hkl) Randsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…By using racemic mixtures of amino acids in which only one enantiomer was labeled by 13 C, a large contrast in rate constants of enantioselective binding was demonstrated on the chiral Cu surfaces. [115][116][117] Enantioselective interaction at the molecular level, including molecular orientations on chiral high-Miller-index surfaces and their equilibrium chemical states, was investigated by theoretical prediction and spectroscopic analysis. Various attempts based on DFT and Monte Carlo simulations have predicted that the adsorption geometries of molecules at energetically 17 11 9S surface.…”
Section: Surface Chirality In Achiral Metal and Inorganicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yun and Gellman demonstrated the impact of chiral surfaces on chiral amplification processes by reporting enantioselective separation of gas phase DL‐aspartic acid by equilibrium adsorption on naturally chiral metal Cu‐(3,1,17) R&S surfaces; the enantiospecific differences in adsorption energetic and reaction kinetics were considered to cause the enantiospecific interactions between chiral molecules and chiral surfaces.…”
Section: Auto‐amplification: Adsorption On An Achiral Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%