Proceedings of the 17th ACM-IEEE International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for System Design 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3359986.3361203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encoding and monitoring responsibility sensitive safety rules for automated vehicles in signal temporal logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the restrictions are lifted when an unsafe situation becomes safe again. For more details see [19] and [22]. In the rest of this section, we represent a slightly modified version of the formula ϕ lat,lon resp from the Remark III.3 in [22].…”
Section: Rssmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All the restrictions are lifted when an unsafe situation becomes safe again. For more details see [19] and [22]. In the rest of this section, we represent a slightly modified version of the formula ϕ lat,lon resp from the Remark III.3 in [22].…”
Section: Rssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more details see [19] and [22]. In the rest of this section, we represent a slightly modified version of the formula ϕ lat,lon resp from the Remark III.3 in [22]. For the sake of space and readability, for the lateral requirements, we assumed that the ego car is driving on the left side of the other car.…”
Section: Rssmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While spatial/topological and physical (low-level) aspects are handled, a precise formal language expressing constraints and properties of the assumed trajectory planning is missing, although its need is mentioned. A partial answer is provided in [20], aiming to monitor RSS rules by encoding signal temporal logic (STL); again this work lacks a precise identification of zero-crossing events, as well as constraint modularity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative viewpoint is presented by responsibility-sensitive safety [7,11,24,27], in the context of autonomous driving, where some hard safety constraints are replaced by a notion of not causing a crash and avoiding one whenever possible. This is particularly well-suited for scenarios where some of the agents are humancontrolled, which can lead to unpredictable behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%