2016
DOI: 10.2217/pme-2016-0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encouraging Physician Adoption of Genetic Testing for Precision Medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefits of blockchain extend beyond eliminating intermediaries and increasing transparency; they also encompass enhanced security, fraud reduction, and improved targeting in digital advertising. This paper will dive deeper into the potential applications of blockchain in marketing, exploring case studies, challenges, and future prospects for this groundbreaking technology [21][22][23].…”
Section: A Blockchain Revolutionizing Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of blockchain extend beyond eliminating intermediaries and increasing transparency; they also encompass enhanced security, fraud reduction, and improved targeting in digital advertising. This paper will dive deeper into the potential applications of blockchain in marketing, exploring case studies, challenges, and future prospects for this groundbreaking technology [21][22][23].…”
Section: A Blockchain Revolutionizing Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As research shows, even though there is compelling evidence of the benefits of new technologies, such as these tests, their use in clinical practice can be hampered by a dynamic interplay of factors at the individual level and at the level of the broader, organizational context [4][5][6]. Healthcare providers might be hesitant about using biomarker tests, for instance, because they do not want to change their professional routines or because they are not fully aware of or lack knowledge about molecular biomarkers [7][8][9]. Previous studies on a molecular biomarker test for breast cancer, for example, showed that the level of use of this test varied among oncologists [10,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%