2017
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2017.1363861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endogeneity in panel stochastic frontier models: an application to the Japanese cotton spinning industry

Abstract: We present a panel stochastic frontier model that handles the endogeneity problem. This model can treat the endogeneity of both frontier and inefficiency variables. We apply our method to examine the technical efficiency of Japanese cotton spinning industry. Our results indicate that market concentration is endogenous, and when its endogeneity is properly handled, it has a larger negative impact on the technical efficiency of cotton spinning plants. We find that the exogenous model substantially overestimates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another relevant issue that has not been addressed by the existing spatial frontier frameworks is the potential endogeneity of the inputs, associated with reverse causality or omitted variable bias. 2 Despite its impact on the consistency of the estimators (Amsler, Prokhorov, & Schmidt, 2016), this important concern has been addressed only recently in the SFA literature (Karakaplan & Kutlu, 2017a, 2017bKutlu, 2010;Tran & Tsionas, 2013), while traditional SFA models tend to ignore this potential bias.…”
Section: Modeling the Heterogeneous Space-time Reactions Of Local Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Another relevant issue that has not been addressed by the existing spatial frontier frameworks is the potential endogeneity of the inputs, associated with reverse causality or omitted variable bias. 2 Despite its impact on the consistency of the estimators (Amsler, Prokhorov, & Schmidt, 2016), this important concern has been addressed only recently in the SFA literature (Karakaplan & Kutlu, 2017a, 2017bKutlu, 2010;Tran & Tsionas, 2013), while traditional SFA models tend to ignore this potential bias.…”
Section: Modeling the Heterogeneous Space-time Reactions Of Local Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• A panel SFA specification that allows to overcome the potential endogeneity of inputs (Karakaplan & Kutlu, 2017b).…”
Section: Modeling the Heterogeneous Space-time Reactions Of Local Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… As explained by Karakaplan and Kutlu (,b, ), estimations with this model are done in a single stage. So, to avoid confusion, we do not use the name “first‐stage statistics” and instead, call them prediction equations. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%