2003
DOI: 10.1080/j.1600-0412.2003.00110.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endometrial thermoablation for treatment of menorrhagia: comparison of two methods in outpatient setting

Abstract: Background. Menorrhagia is one of the commonest reasons for gynecologic consultations. Inhibitors of fibrinolysis and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are generally used as therapy for the condition with an acceptable response in some patients. Endometrial ablation is one choice in patients suffering from menorrhagia. It can be performed in patients with no endometrial histological or anatomical pathology. In this method, the functional endometrial tissue is ablated under general anesthesia in an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thermal ablation is associated with a complication rate of about 0–13%, hysteroscopic about 6–25% (A) (79), (99). The techniques for endometrial destruction give equal results with regard to therapy outcome and patient satisfaction (A) (64), (93), (99), (110), (111). Preoperative administration of a GnRH analogue increases amenorrhoea during the first year after the procedure, but in the longer term there are no differences in menstrual blood loss compared with women who took no preoperative treatment (A) (106).…”
Section: Guidelinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal ablation is associated with a complication rate of about 0–13%, hysteroscopic about 6–25% (A) (79), (99). The techniques for endometrial destruction give equal results with regard to therapy outcome and patient satisfaction (A) (64), (93), (99), (110), (111). Preoperative administration of a GnRH analogue increases amenorrhoea during the first year after the procedure, but in the longer term there are no differences in menstrual blood loss compared with women who took no preoperative treatment (A) (106).…”
Section: Guidelinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is only one small observational study in the literature regarding the effectiveness of this device reporting an amenorrhea rate of 10% at 1 year follow-up [59], and just one small randomized control study comparing Menotreat® and Cavaterm® [60], reporting amenorrhea rates up to 19% in the Menotreat® group and up to 13% in the Cavaterm® group.…”
Section: Second-generation Endometrial Ablation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В 1990-е годы появились негистероскопические методики аблации эндометрия 2-го поколения, к которым относится баллонная термоаблация. Клиницисты [17,26,28] отметили их высо-кую эффективность (89-100 %) при небольшом количестве осложнений. До настоящего времени остаются нерешенны-ми ряд проблем, связанных с применением термоаблации эндометрия.…”
unclassified