2021
DOI: 10.2478/jtim-2021-0031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic transmural drainage and necrosectomy in acute necrotizing pancreatitis: A review

Abstract: Acute necrotizing pancreatitis occurs in 10%–20% of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) which is one of the most important acute abdominal diseases that require hospital admission. Pancreatic necrosis is also associated with high mortality and morbidity. In the past 20 years, the treatment of pancreatic necrosis has shifted from open necrosectomy to minimally invasive techniques, such as endoscopic interventions. With the development of endoscopic techniques, the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic interv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, in review, factors indicating time of intervention during patient’s clinical course including onset of pancreatic necrosis and percent necrosis were not uniformly discussed across previously published literature. As aforementioned, commonly FCSEMS, LAMS, and plastic stents have commonly been utilized, but studies have been limited comparing clinical efficacy, safety, leading to inconsistent results 40 . Minimally invasive drainage via step-up approach, VARD and PEN, has shown superior drainage, debridement in comparison to frank surgical approach with regard to complications and long-term morbidity with no paper reporting direct comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, in review, factors indicating time of intervention during patient’s clinical course including onset of pancreatic necrosis and percent necrosis were not uniformly discussed across previously published literature. As aforementioned, commonly FCSEMS, LAMS, and plastic stents have commonly been utilized, but studies have been limited comparing clinical efficacy, safety, leading to inconsistent results 40 . Minimally invasive drainage via step-up approach, VARD and PEN, has shown superior drainage, debridement in comparison to frank surgical approach with regard to complications and long-term morbidity with no paper reporting direct comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, in review, factors indicating time of intervention during patient's clinical course including onset of pancreatic necrosis and percent necrosis were not uniformly discussed across previously published literature. As aforementioned, commonly FCSEMS, LAMS, and plastic stents have commonly been utilized, but studies have been limited comparing clinical efficacy, safety, leading to inconsistent results [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different imaging techniques have their advantages and disadvantages, and their combined application can achieve complementary advantages and improve the value of clinical applications[ 58 ]. In addition, the management of radiopharmaceuticals is extremely strict in some countries, and very few radiopharmaceuticals are clinically approved.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Molecular Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AGA regards this practice as an appropriate technique in patients who do not respond appropriately to EUS-guided drainage, and it is best used in patients who have limited necrosis [ 12 ]. Studies have illustrated that DEN has high clinical success rates [ 33 - 35 ] ( Fig. 2 ).…”
Section: Non-endoscopic Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%