2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy contribution of NOVA food groups and the nutritional profile of the Brazilian rural workers' diets

Abstract: We estimated the caloric contribution of minimally processed foods, processed culinary ingredients, processed foods and ultra-processed foods in Brazilian farmers' diets and their association with the nutritional profile of the diet. It is an epidemiological study of cross-sectional, analytical and quantitative design with 740 farmers adults of Southeastern Brazil. Food intake data were obtained by applying three 24-hour recalls and were classified according to the degree and purpose of processing. The largest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
15
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
15
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when compared with worldwide evaluations of UPF consumption, the presented results are reasonably consistent and comparable [47]. For instance, a study conducted on 740 Brazilian rural farmers reported that the largest caloric contribution to their diet was provided by minimally processed foods (64.7%), while UPFs contributed only minimally (5.2%); however, a higher dietary share of UPFs led to a lower intake of all macro-and micronutrients, without a distinction between healthy and unhealthy ones [48]. A study conducted on 223 Colombian school children from lowto middle-income families reported that increased shares of processed foods and UPFs in the diet (representing 34.4% of total daily energy intake) was accompanied by a lower intake of vitamins A, B12, C, and E, calcium, and zinc, and a higher intake of sodium, sugar, and trans-fatty acids [49].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, when compared with worldwide evaluations of UPF consumption, the presented results are reasonably consistent and comparable [47]. For instance, a study conducted on 740 Brazilian rural farmers reported that the largest caloric contribution to their diet was provided by minimally processed foods (64.7%), while UPFs contributed only minimally (5.2%); however, a higher dietary share of UPFs led to a lower intake of all macro-and micronutrients, without a distinction between healthy and unhealthy ones [48]. A study conducted on 223 Colombian school children from lowto middle-income families reported that increased shares of processed foods and UPFs in the diet (representing 34.4% of total daily energy intake) was accompanied by a lower intake of vitamins A, B12, C, and E, calcium, and zinc, and a higher intake of sodium, sugar, and trans-fatty acids [49].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Only 8.8% ( n = 65) of farmers had lower consumption than the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs) of 55 μg/day established for this nutrient. These results are possibly due to the high consumption of meat, eggs and minimally processed food sources identified in this population ( 18 , 52 ). The high intake of this micronutrient in the Brazilian population has also been reported by other studies ( 53 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Recent studies demonstrate that, in fact, apart from the problems related to the type of work activity performed, there is also a high prevalence of other chronic diseases in the field that are common to a more urbanized lifestyle, such as high blood pressure [ 28 , 52 , 54 , 55 , 65 , 66 ], dyslipidemia [ 28 , 54 , 55 ], and diabetes mellitus [ 65 67 ]; all conditions closely related to general and abdominal obesity [ 6 ]. Specifically in this same population, we could already identify high prevalences of multimorbidity [ 27 ], cardiovascular risk [ 28 ], hypertension [ 29 ], depression [ 32 , 33 ] and consumption to industrialized foods [ 30 , 31 ], however, obesity had not yet been studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to mention that other studies that evaluated food consumption in rural areas identified that many individuals in these regions maintained their consumption of traditional foods, such as rice, breads, leafy beans, beans, cow’s milk, animal fats, margarine, sugar, cassava flour and coffee [ 30 , 57 , 91 93 ]. However, it is also possible to notice an increase in consumption of industrialized foods [ 30 , 31 , 93 96 ], which demonstrates that factors associated with globalization also affect eating habits in rural areas [ 30 , 66 , 94 – 97 ]. Although agricultural residents have options to obtain their food from their plantations or through community sharing, they may have limited availability of healthy food due to the long distances from places that sell food, in addition to the high prices of some items in small local markets, low availability of transport for access to cheaper products and difficulty of storing these foods [ 98 , 99 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%