Background The eating habits have changed in the last few decades, but few studies prioritize the food consumption of farmers and the rural population. Therefore, the objective of this study was explore the sociodemographic, occupational and lifestyle factors to the high adherence these dietary patterns. Methods This is a cross-sectional epidemiological study of 740 farmers (51.5%, n = 381 males; 48.5%, n = 359 females) from a municipality in Southeastern Brazil. Food intake data were obtained by applying multipass 24-h recall and dietary intake was presented in dietary patterns determined by Principal Component Analysis with varimax orthogonal rotation. Results Three dietary patterns were identified. The first pattern, “local traditional”, was associated with sociodemographic and labor variables, being considered typical of the region’s farmer as white race/color (p = 0.003), not extra-physical activity (p = 0.014) and cultivating 5 or more crops (p = 0.005). The permanence of a “traditional Brazilian” pattern and the occurrence of an “industrialized” pattern were also observed. Farmers working in non-conventional agriculture were 54% less adhere to “traditional Brazilian” pattern (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25–0.86, p = 0.014). Individuals aged 50 and over years were 82% less likely (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.10–0.30) to adhere to “industrialized” pattern. Still, individuals of lower socioeconomic class were 52% less likely to adhere to this pattern (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24–0.96). Farmers who spent R$ 200 or more per capita to buy food were more than twice as likely to adhere to this food pattern (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.32–3.73), and who had the habit of frequently eating out were 1.62 as likely adhere to “industrialized” pattern (95% CI 1.11–2.36). Conclusions The findings indicate changes in dietary patterns in rural areas of the country, maintaining a traditional Brazilian pattern, as well as a local and an industrialized pattern. This last pattern demonstrates that the contemporary rural population also opts for a diet with ultra-processed products, being associated with the characteristic habits of a more urbanized rural region.

Resumo Objetivo: caracterizar a exposição ocupacional, percepção do risco, práticas de segurança e fatores associados ao uso de equipamento de proteção individual (EPI) durante a manipulação de agrotóxicos. Métodos: estudo transversal com amostra representativa de agricultores de Santa Maria de Jetibá, Espírito Santo. Procedeu-se à caracterização sociodemográfica e ocupacional dos agricultores com exposição direta a agrotóxicos e a identificação dos ingredientes ativos e classificação toxicológica dos produtos utilizados. Resultados: foram referidas 106 marcas comerciais, 45 grupos químicos e 77 ingredientes ativos. Houve predomínio do herbicida glifosato. Dos 550 agricultores avaliados 89% referiram uso de agrotóxicos extremamente tóxicos, 56,3% utilizavam mais de cinco agrotóxicos e 51% trabalhavam há mais de 20 anos em contato direto com estes produtos. Metade não lia rótulo dos agrotóxicos, mais de um terço não observava o tempo de carência para colheita e reaplicação e nem o de reentrada na lavoura; 71,4% não utilizavam EPI ou utilizavam de forma incompleta. Entre os fatores associados à não utilização do EPI, destaca-se a classe socioeconômica (p = 0,002), baixa escolaridade (p = 0,05), falta de suporte técnico (p < 0,001) e não leitura dos rótulos (p < 0,001). Conclusão: os agricultores apresentaram exposição ocupacional prolongada a múltiplos agrotóxicos de elevada toxidade, referindo práticas inseguras de manuseio.

Objective To estimate the prevalence of multimorbidity and complex multimorbidity in rural workers and their association with sociodemographic characteristics, occupational contact with pesticides, lifestyle and clinical condition. Methods This is a cross-sectional epidemiological study with 806 farmers from the main agricultural municipality of the state of Espírito Santo/Brazil, conducted from December 2016 to April 2017. Multimorbidity was defined as the presence of two or more chronic diseases in the same individual, while complex multimorbidity was classified as the occurrence of three or more chronic conditions affecting three or more body systems. Socio-demographic data, occupational contact with pesticides, lifestyle data and clinical condition data were collected through a structured questionnaire. Binary logistic regression was conducted to identify risk factors for multimorbidity. Results The prevalence of multimorbidity among farmers was 41.5% (n = 328), and complex multimorbidity was 16.7% (n = 132). More than 77% of farmers had at least one chronic illness. Hypertension, dyslipidemia and depression were the most prevalent morbidities. Being 40 years or older (OR 3.33, 95% CI 2.06-5.39), previous medical diagnosis of pesticide poisoning (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.03-3.44), high waist circumference (OR 2.82, CI 95% 1.98-4.02) and worse health self-assessment (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.52-2.91) significantly increased the chances of multimorbidity. The same associations were found for the diagnosis of complex multimorbidity.

Autoavaliação do estado de saúde e fatores associados: um estudo em trabalhadores bancários Self-assessment of health status and associated factors: a study in bank workers Autoevaluación del estado de salud y factores asociados: un estudio en empleados del banco

(odds ratio, 3.69, 95% CI, working in bank agencies (odds ratio, 2.55, 95% CI,, a length of employment at the bank of more than five years (odds ratio, 3.32, 95% CI,), a daily work period of six hours (odds ratio, 2.72, 95% CI, and, mainly, low social support (odds ratio, 2.57,.