2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy demand and carbon footprint of treating household food waste compared to its prevention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Safar et al, 2016), at the same time disposing waste in a more environmentally feasible way (Uçkun Kiran et al, 2014b). Practices like AD recovery (Breitenmoser et al, 2019) significantly reduce CO2 emissions (Prasad, 2016), taking into consideration also the fuel replacement within the power grid (Slorach et al, 2019;Verstraete et al, 2016). FW is also beneficial to polymers production (Uçkun Kiran et al, 2015), from bacteria processing carbon-rich material (Tamis et al, 2015), and as potential feedstock for the production of value added chemicals and for cosmeceutical valorisation (Piccolella et al, 2019).…”
Section: Technological Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Safar et al, 2016), at the same time disposing waste in a more environmentally feasible way (Uçkun Kiran et al, 2014b). Practices like AD recovery (Breitenmoser et al, 2019) significantly reduce CO2 emissions (Prasad, 2016), taking into consideration also the fuel replacement within the power grid (Slorach et al, 2019;Verstraete et al, 2016). FW is also beneficial to polymers production (Uçkun Kiran et al, 2015), from bacteria processing carbon-rich material (Tamis et al, 2015), and as potential feedstock for the production of value added chemicals and for cosmeceutical valorisation (Piccolella et al, 2019).…”
Section: Technological Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food wastage can occur also because of problematic relationships between producers and retailers (Eriksson et al, 2017) and because of food standards, contractual conditions and wrong product forecasting (Girotto et al, 2015). Also, the household level plays a crucial role in FW generation (Slorach et al, 2019). In this context, FW mainly occurs due to bad management (Breitenmoser et al, 2019), in varying forms from whole materials to fractions or mixtures (Uçkun Kiran et al, 2014a).…”
Section: Cultural Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous estimations show that food waste, including organic waste and packaging, contributes almost 7% of global carbon footprint that is an environmental impact indicator. Therefore, recycling of food waste or zero‐waste approach may be a good method to mitigate environmental impact and energy loss in food processing (Eriksson & Spångberg, 2017; Oldfield et al, 2016; Slorach et al, 2019). Pomace is a great example of biodegradable and valued food industry waste.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These embodied emissions are not accounted for when analyzing food waste as a fuel stream for WTE, which simply shifts this GHG burden to another sector. Additionally, purely biogenic waste is eligible for pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion as alternative waste management options that generate energy and possibly with a lower life cycle climate change impact. ,, …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, purely biogenic waste is eligible for pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion as alternative waste management options that generate energy and possibly with a lower life cycle climate change impact. 22,53,54 System expansion to account for the alternative of landfilling MSW suggests that there may be a climate change benefit to WTE as a waste management practice that also generates electricity by crediting the system for relative GHG emissions avoided. However, as a method of electricity generation alone, without considering the fuel source as an inevitable nuisance that must be managed, the GHG emissions of WTE-sourced electricity are an order of magnitude larger than any other renewable electricity resource examined for comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%