1974
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1098(74)91020-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy gap of the superconducting semiconductor SrTiO3−x determined by tunneling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temperature dependence of the local pair binding energy  deduced from the excitation gap has been also studied in diamond and silicon, and found in excellent agreement with a s-wave BCS superconductivity with a BCS ratio /kBTC = 1.75 both for a C:B plate 140 and C(100):B epilayers 123,139 , while a 20% dispersion about the BCS value was observed 143 on Si:B. Two coupled gaps had been detected earlier in SrTiO3, with a BCS ratio close to 1.76 for the larger one 96 , as well as a possible signature of the soft phonon mode at 1.9 meV involved in the low temperature structural transition 138 . Moreover, optical methods have yielded superconducting gap values for C(111):B, infrared and THz spectroscopies 116 appearing to be better suited than high resolution photoemission 109 for the purpose.…”
Section: D Superconducting Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The temperature dependence of the local pair binding energy  deduced from the excitation gap has been also studied in diamond and silicon, and found in excellent agreement with a s-wave BCS superconductivity with a BCS ratio /kBTC = 1.75 both for a C:B plate 140 and C(100):B epilayers 123,139 , while a 20% dispersion about the BCS value was observed 143 on Si:B. Two coupled gaps had been detected earlier in SrTiO3, with a BCS ratio close to 1.76 for the larger one 96 , as well as a possible signature of the soft phonon mode at 1.9 meV involved in the low temperature structural transition 138 . Moreover, optical methods have yielded superconducting gap values for C(111):B, infrared and THz spectroscopies 116 appearing to be better suited than high resolution photoemission 109 for the purpose.…”
Section: D Superconducting Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Since the pioneering tunnel spectroscopy studies 16 of GeTe, the superconducting gap of energy seen by the quasiparticles around the Fermi level has been investigated in 96,138 SrTiO3 , in 139 C(100):B, in 140 C:B, in 141,142 C(111):B and 143 Si:B. Thanks to the development of ultra-low T scanning tunnel microscopy (STM) and spectroscopy (STS), the latter studies have provided local maps of the local variations of the coherence peak intensity and of the superconducting gap 139,142,143 .…”
Section: D Superconducting Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simultaneously, the reference potential with respect to the reference electrode was measured in order to precisely estimate the junction voltage V J . As the tunnel current is determined by the total number of electronic states which electrons can tunnel into, the differential tunneling conductance dI/dV encodes the energyresolved density of states (DOS) of FeSn overlaid onto a monotonic background signal arising from, e.g., energy-dependent DOS of the tunnel electrode [40][41][42][43][44][45][46] . We note that in the regime where the tunnel electrode has a small Fermi energy (i.e., E F,electrode < < |V J |) when V J < 0 the observed dI/dV is a direct measure of the intrinsic DOS spectrum (the case we will investigate primarily here); this is contrary to the case of V J > 0 where the absence of electronic states below the electrode's conduction band edge can make such a direct analysis more difficult (see Supplementary Note 23).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limit is appropriate, since via tunneling bulk doped STO is known to be in the weak-coupling regime [25]. The variation of H In the case of a 2D superconductor in a parallel magnetic field, if the sample is thin enough that orbital depairing is suppressed, spin paramagnetism is the dominant mechanism for destroying superconductivity [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%