2008
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.45.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Measurement of X-rays in Computed Tomography for Detecting Contrast Media

Abstract: The advantages of energy measurement of x-rays over current measurement in transmission radiography and computed tomography (CT) for detecting iodine contrast media are discussed. Simulation studies on both methods of measurement are carried out, followed by experiments. As data for energy measurement of x-rays, the event ratio of two energy regions with a K-edge of iodine between them is employed. The energy measurement method is immune to beam hardening, while current measurement suffers greatly with changes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ES CT values from acrylic regions, however, depended on the acrylic thickness through which the x-rays passed. We did not observe this variation in CT values in the acrylic region when the energy of each x-ray was measured using a conventional CdZnTe detector [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ES CT values from acrylic regions, however, depended on the acrylic thickness through which the x-rays passed. We did not observe this variation in CT values in the acrylic region when the energy of each x-ray was measured using a conventional CdZnTe detector [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…As shown in Ref. [2], by exploiting the x-ray events at energies above and below the K-edge of iodine, the absorption effect by iodine is clearly observed, despite the difficulties induced by the x-ray tube voltage and the subject thickness. This method is called energy subtraction (ES) CT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…On the other hand, the CT value in the iodine region differs clearly from the one in the acryl region in the ES measurement. The CT value for the ES method has been shown to be proportional to the iodine thickness [6]. An iodine thickness of 1 µm could be detected with the ES method because the CT value -0.09 0.02 -0.09 0.02 differences between the center and fringe of the iodine region is nearly 0.02 using the ES method whereas it is 0.002 using the current method.…”
Section: Ct Measurementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[1] Furthermore, the FIX-ES method was shown to be twice as sensitive to iodine as the current measurement method. [2] Journal logo…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%