2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2008.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy spectral density characterization of microseismic events in potash mines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, the mathematical analysis method was extensively applied in to analyze the distribution of the main frequency of MS signals. Ge [32] and Errington et al [33] analyzed the energy spectral density characterization of MS events in two potash mines and found that peak frequency of MS signals is approximately 38 Hz or 54 Hz. Lu et al [34] studied the spectrum characteristics of MS signals monitored in situ, such as coal and gas outburst, rock burst, pressure release blasting, etc., and found that before a coal and gas outburst occurred, the low-frequency component of 0-10 Hz changed significantly, and the relatively high-frequency component of 90-240 Hz increased correspondingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, the mathematical analysis method was extensively applied in to analyze the distribution of the main frequency of MS signals. Ge [32] and Errington et al [33] analyzed the energy spectral density characterization of MS events in two potash mines and found that peak frequency of MS signals is approximately 38 Hz or 54 Hz. Lu et al [34] studied the spectrum characteristics of MS signals monitored in situ, such as coal and gas outburst, rock burst, pressure release blasting, etc., and found that before a coal and gas outburst occurred, the low-frequency component of 0-10 Hz changed significantly, and the relatively high-frequency component of 90-240 Hz increased correspondingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is commonly found that microseismic focus energy obtained from the energy density method is relatively defective and is not reliable enough [20,21]. As obtained from the idealized theoretical model, focus energy computation is easily influenced by geological difference, manual operation, and firmware performance [22,23]. Relative dispersion of individual focus energy obtained from different channels is great with the high dependency on the physical properties of rock medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%