2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12208-020-00273-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engagement in social networks: a multi-method study in non-profits organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nearly half of the microvlogs (46%) primarily engaged in community building. This finding indicates that the function of microvlogging on TikTok is different from microblogging on Twitter and Facebook, where the primary functions are information sharing or action (Campbell & Lambright, 2020; Klafke et al, 2021).…”
Section: Findings: Social Media Engagement Via Microvloggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nearly half of the microvlogs (46%) primarily engaged in community building. This finding indicates that the function of microvlogging on TikTok is different from microblogging on Twitter and Facebook, where the primary functions are information sharing or action (Campbell & Lambright, 2020; Klafke et al, 2021).…”
Section: Findings: Social Media Engagement Via Microvloggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On Facebook, information sharing garners the most attention from followers (measured through likes, comments, and shares). Though the most common post type in Klafke et al's study-action-oriented posts-garnered the least engagement (Klafke et al, 2021). If nonprofits want to engage with stakeholders in dialogic communication, microblogging is unfit because its affordances are not as conducive to the back-and-forth communication necessary for community building as operationalized in the framework.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Hierarchy Of Nonprofit Social Media E...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microblog type that garners the most attention on Facebook (measured through likes, comments, and shares) is informationsharing. Action-oriented microblogs gain the least attention despite being the most commonly posted type (Klafke et al, 2021). However, action-oriented messaging is more productive for larger interest groups (Figenschou & Fredheim, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Review Social Media Outputs and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social media and networks have also proved to be useful for fostering social interaction between fundraisers and potential donors that lead to reinforce the engagement and build lasting relationships benefiting both, promoters organizations and target audiences (Guidry et al, 2014;Shawky et al, 2019;Kuo et al, 2017;Klafke et al, 2021;Seyla & Miranti, 2021). From humanized DCF platforms with the help of social media, and specifically through the use of embedded share functions, potential donors will help to spread DCF campaigns, sharing them from their own social media and networks such as Facebook and Twitter, and allowing others to visit the campaigns' site in order to raise both awareness and contributions (Choy & Schlagwein, 2016;Snyder et al, 2016;Berliner & Kenworthy, 2017).…”
Section: Campaign Spreadabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, further studies could also test these comments, interactions, and reactions in social media as moderator variables for campaigns' success. These future research streams could be useful, on the one hand, to contribute to the still scarce emerging literature on the impact that information communication through social media has on donations and on engagement behavior (Han, 2021;Klafke et al, 2021); and, on the other, they could help determine the extent to which two-way online interactions (between donors and fundraisers) through online dialog in social media can increase the efficiency of online accountability practices (Seyla & Miranti, 2021) and, by extension, the likelihood of the campaigns succeeding.…”
Section: Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%