“…[23][24][25] However,t hese initial studies mainly focused on embedding functional enzymes in protective MOF cages without emphasizing the embedding patterns,a nd only limited consideration has been given to the conversion of the enzymatic biofunctionality after entrapment by aMOFs.This is worthy of attention, as the de novo encapsulating process could result in inactivation of enzymes due to their fragile nature.Indeed, we noticed that in some cases the enzymes are partially or even completely inactive when encapsulated within zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) crystals (see below), aw idely used exoskeleton for in situ enzyme encapsulation. [10,11,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] In this work, we sought to reveal how embedding patterns influence the biofunctionality of enzymes encapsulated within ZIF-8 and to develop an ew strategy to produce enzymes@ZIF-8 biocomposites that maintain high enzymatic activity.W ec hose six typical enzymes as models, glucose oxidase (GOx), cytochrome C( Cyt C), horseradish peroxidase (HRP), catalase (CAT), urate oxidase (UOx) and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH). These enzymes are extremely valuable across aw ide range of industries,i ncluding biofuel, food, and biosensing, and as therapeutics in the pharmaceutical industry.O ur findings show that ZIF-8-embedded enzymes (enzymes@ZIF-8), wherein the enzymes were encapsulated through rapid self-triggered nucleation around their surface,maintain high enzymatic activity,comparable to the free enzymes.I nt he other encapsulation process,w here the MOF nucleated as they normally would in the absence of the enzymes,a nd the enzymes were encapsulated through slow coprecipitation, the obtained enzymes@ZIF-8 tended to be inactive due to unfolding effects and competing coordination caused by the 2-methyl imidazole (HmIM) ligand.…”