2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95406-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced genome editing efficiency of CRISPR PLUS: Cas9 chimeric fusion proteins

Abstract: Efforts to improve CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing systems for lower off-target effects are mostly at the cost of its robust on-target efficiency. To enhance both accuracy and efficiency, we created chimeric SpyCas9 proteins fused with the 5′-to-3′ exonuclease Recombination J (RecJ) or with GFP and demonstrated that transfection of the pre-assembled ribonucleoprotein of the two chimeric proteins into human or plant cells resulted in greater targeted mutagenesis efficiency up to 600% without noticeable increase in o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 systems for genome editing is typically correlated with their level of off-target modifications [82]: increased efficacy tends to come at the price of higher off-target mutation rates [82], i.e., there is a trade-off between efficacy and targeting precision, and the number of off-target modifications depends on the design and execution of the particular genome-editing approach. Not all genome-editing approaches are optimized for maximum targeting precision and thus a very low-level of off-target modifications.…”
Section: Considerations Concerning the Assessment Of Unintended Genet...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 systems for genome editing is typically correlated with their level of off-target modifications [82]: increased efficacy tends to come at the price of higher off-target mutation rates [82], i.e., there is a trade-off between efficacy and targeting precision, and the number of off-target modifications depends on the design and execution of the particular genome-editing approach. Not all genome-editing approaches are optimized for maximum targeting precision and thus a very low-level of off-target modifications.…”
Section: Considerations Concerning the Assessment Of Unintended Genet...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fusion with chromatinmodulating peptides has been demonstrated to improve the editing efficiency of SpCas9 by up to several fold [28]. Other attempts to enhance the efficiency of Cas-mediated gene editing include fusion of SpCas9 to proteins, including exonucleases, endonucleases, and deaminases [29]. For example, chimeric fusion with a three prime repair exonuclease 2 increased the mutagenic efficiency of SpCas9 2.5-fold [30].…”
Section: Editing Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these reports demonstrated the positive effects of UCP1-expressing adipocytes on metabolism, technologies used for gene regulation have limitations. CRISPR gene editing has low efficiency and off-target effects, and lentiviral vectors integrate into the genome and alter gene transcription [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. To improve the development of UCP1-expressing adipocytes for clinical translation, we suggest CRISPRa technology, delivered by baculovirus vectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%