2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing biohydrogen production from sugar industry wastewater using metal oxide/graphene nanocomposite catalysts in microbial electrolysis cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the sulphide ion concentration exceeded 0.2 M, however, the hydrogen production rate decreased unexpectedly. Such a sudden decease of hydrogen production at the higher ion concentration can be explained by photocatalytic corrosion on the catalyst surface, which degrades the hydrogen production efficiency [ 65 , 66 ]. When using sulphite ion-involved wastewater, we observed a similar feature of hydrogen production activities ( Figure 6 b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the sulphide ion concentration exceeded 0.2 M, however, the hydrogen production rate decreased unexpectedly. Such a sudden decease of hydrogen production at the higher ion concentration can be explained by photocatalytic corrosion on the catalyst surface, which degrades the hydrogen production efficiency [ 65 , 66 ]. When using sulphite ion-involved wastewater, we observed a similar feature of hydrogen production activities ( Figure 6 b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, energy conversion efficiency with biophotolysis was found to be around 2.4-4% [22]. Jayabalan et al [138] found a maximum H 2 production rate of 4.38 ± 0.11 mmol/L/D from the sugar industry wastewater using MEC. A H 2 production rate of 3.48 L/L/d and an H 2 yield of 511.02 mL H 2 g −1 VS was reported from food waste anaerobic digestion coupled with MEC [117].…”
Section: Challenges With Biohydrogen Production Through Biological Mementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, fermentation processes yield 2 mol acetate and 4 mol H 2 from 1 mol of glucose, whereas MECs are capable of producing 12 mol H 2 /mol glucose due to the fact that they also utilize residual organic materials (Parkash, 2016). To explore hydrogen production in the MEC using sugar industrial effluent as a substrate versus phosphate buffer catholyte, Jayabalan et al (2020) used two graphene metal oxide nanocomposites as catalysts. At a 1.0 V voltage, the NiO.rGO nanocomposite demonstrated 4.38 ± 0.11 mmol/L/D as a maximum hydrogen generation rate, 20.8% cathodic hydrogen recovery and 65.6% coloumbic efficiency.…”
Section: Bioremediationmentioning
confidence: 99%