Comprehensive Handbook of Cognitive Therapy 1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-9779-4_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Cognitive Therapy with Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the inclusive definition of minority populations, however, there is a growing number of articles on cognitive-behavior therapy with minority populations, most of them published within the last few years. These studies include investigations of the usefulness of cognitive-behavior therapy with Puerto Rican women (Comas-Diaz, 1981) and religious Christian clients (Johnson & Ridley, 1992); a feminist critique of cognitive-behavior therapy (Kantrowitz & Ballou, 1992); discussions of special considerations in conducting multimodal assessment with Mexican Americans (Ponterotto, 1987) and cognitive therapy with gay men (Kuehlwein, 1992), lesbians (Wolfe, 1992), women (Davis & Padesky, 1989) and battered women (Douglas & Strom, 1988), Native Americans (Renfry, 1992), and older people (Glantz, 1989;Thompson, Davies, Gallagher, & Krantz, 1986). In addition, there have been articles published on assertiveness and social skills training with ethnic minority groups (LaFromboise & Rowe, 1983;Wood & Mallinckrodt, 1990) and women (Gambrill & Richey, 1986); a discussion of creative problem-solving with people who have new disabilities (Frieden & Cole, 1984); and a case study of rationalemotive therapy with an unmarried, pregnant Mormon client (by Ellis, summarized in A. E. Ivey, M. B.…”
Section: Cognitive-behavior Therapy and Cultural Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the inclusive definition of minority populations, however, there is a growing number of articles on cognitive-behavior therapy with minority populations, most of them published within the last few years. These studies include investigations of the usefulness of cognitive-behavior therapy with Puerto Rican women (Comas-Diaz, 1981) and religious Christian clients (Johnson & Ridley, 1992); a feminist critique of cognitive-behavior therapy (Kantrowitz & Ballou, 1992); discussions of special considerations in conducting multimodal assessment with Mexican Americans (Ponterotto, 1987) and cognitive therapy with gay men (Kuehlwein, 1992), lesbians (Wolfe, 1992), women (Davis & Padesky, 1989) and battered women (Douglas & Strom, 1988), Native Americans (Renfry, 1992), and older people (Glantz, 1989;Thompson, Davies, Gallagher, & Krantz, 1986). In addition, there have been articles published on assertiveness and social skills training with ethnic minority groups (LaFromboise & Rowe, 1983;Wood & Mallinckrodt, 1990) and women (Gambrill & Richey, 1986); a discussion of creative problem-solving with people who have new disabilities (Frieden & Cole, 1984); and a case study of rationalemotive therapy with an unmarried, pregnant Mormon client (by Ellis, summarized in A. E. Ivey, M. B.…”
Section: Cognitive-behavior Therapy and Cultural Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%